Zbigniew Brzezinski: Russian aggression in Ukraine potentially poses biggest threat to Belarus
01.07.2014 |Politics| EuroBelarus Information Service,
Though use of force in Crimea and the ongoing destabilization of Ukraine are threatening the Baltic States, Georgia and Moldova, Belarus is most vulnerable, as it doesn’t have any external protection.
Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Polish American political scientist, spoke on a panel at the Wilson Center on June 16 titled “Mutual Security on Hold? Russia, the West, and European Security Architecture”. He spoke about “the implications for the European security architecture of the Ukrainian problem in the relationship of Russia and the West”.
According to the expert, Putin has taken the lead in a Russian “quasi-mystical chauvinism”and its content is significant for the totality of Russia’s relations with the world, and the West in particular.
It would be an error to think that Crimea and Ukraine are just the products of a sudden outrage, he adds. “Understanding the doctrinal framework of Putin’s vision is an important point of departure for dealing with the Ukraine issue. The Ukraine issue is not a sudden pique, but a symptom, as I have said, of a basic problem: the emergence of the policies packaged within the larger philosophical framework”, - claims Zbigniew Brzezinski, referring to the report by the Russian International Affairs Council which has four key concepts: first, that of “a divided people”; secondly, the theme of “protecting compatriots abroad”; third and more broadly, “the Russian world”; fourth, the importance of acknowledging and sustaining, embracing and promoting “the Great Russian civilization”. “But also a great deal will depend on whether Ukraine becomes a symptom either of a success or a failure of Putin’s point of view. So in brief, the stakes are significant <…> That is a significant threat—and broadly speaking, an immediate threat; psychologically at least, but potentially, in view of Crimea, also militarily. It is a threat to the Baltic States, to Georgia, to Moldova. And more vaguely and directly, but perhaps potentially more dangerously than to the others, Belarus, because Belarus does not have any external protection. The others that I have mentioned do, in varying degrees,” he says.
A divided people is the point of departure for the chauvinistic claim that Russia’s sovereignty embraces all Russians, wherever they are. And that territorial location can be altered favorably by reuniting the Russian people.
“Last but not least is the conviction that Russia is not part of Western civilization. It is also not part of China. It is not part of the Muslim World. Russia itself, it is asserted, is a great civilization. The notion of a “world civilization” emphasizes a set of principles, some of which are not unfamiliar to our society, such as, for example, a strong commitment to a particular religion, but much stronger than in the West where religion is part of a more complex social arrangement. The notion is that the great Russian civilization stands for certain basic values, not only religious, but in terms of interpersonal relationships—for example, condemning some of the changes in the relationship between the sexes and within the sexes that are now taking place in the world. In effect, Russia protects the integrity of certain basic beliefs that have characterized Christianity, but in the Russian view, that Christianity is now betraying its fundamentals. So this is a comprehensive outlook—an ambitious outlook which justifies the conclusion that Russia is a world power,” Brzezinski warns.
According to the political scientist, the Ukrainian problem is a challenge that the West must address on three levels: to effectively deter the temptation facing the Russian leadership regarding the use of force; secondly, to obtain the termination of Russia’s deliberate efforts at the destabilization of parts of Ukraine, thirdly, to promote and then discuss with the Russians a formula for an eventual compromise, assuming that in the first instance the use of force openly and on a large scale is deterred and the effort to destabilize is abandoned.
At the end of his speech Dr. Brzezinski expressed hope “that the new emerging Russian middle class—realizing that the kind of mythology that Putin has adopted, and which a significant portion of the less educated, more chauvinistic Russians, have absorbed and embraced—is a road to nowhere; that the real place for Russia is as an important country in Europe, as a major European country”.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.