Thursday 28 March 2024 | 22:33

Ulad Vialichka: Europe is growing sober, but its reaction is too slow

01.02.2015  |  Politics   |  Aliaksei Jurych, EuroBelarus,  
Ulad Vialichka: Europe is growing sober, but its reaction is too slow

The EU is underestimating the long-term nature of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which is already common-European.

The EU has prolonged sanctions against Russian officials and pro-Russian separatists. This decision was taken by the Foreign Ministers of the EU countries in relation to activation of hostilities and the east of Ukraine and Russia’s role in it. This decision is to be ratified at the Summit of the EU Heads on February 12.

The EU didn’t extend sanctions against Russia, though the discussion about it started immediately after the attack in Mariupol, in result of which 30 people died and more then 100 were injured. Instead of that European politicians promise to toughen sanctions in case the gunmen go on the offensive to Mariupol.

The reasons for the weak reaction of Europe to activation of hostilities in Ukraine “EuroBelarus” Information Service discussed with Ulad Vialichka, the head of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”.

- The EU prolonged sanctions against Russian officials and terrorists for six months. Are these measures able to stop activation of hostilities in Donbas?

- Extension of the existing sanctions is hardly able to stop activation of hostilities, which are developing according to their own logic. Actions of the EU are clearly reactive and are very late. In this sense leaders of some European countries express their opinion more clearly and critically.

I think that Europe lacks clear strategy of how to stop escalation of violence in Ukraine.

On the other hand, now we are getting a clue of the real role Russia plays in this conflict. Europe is growing sober, but its reaction is too slow.

- The Foreign Minister of Germany Frank-Walter Steinmeier explained why the EU would toughen sanctions against Russia if gunmen go on the offensive to Mariupol. Why not to toughen sanctions after the attack in Mariupol? What has held the EU back this time?

- The same factors, and most of all – the depth of Russia-Europe economic relations. Europe is ambiguous; it consists of different interest groups, including business-interests. It is these groups that seek to postpone introduction of tough sanctions against Russia, which might boomerang against them and affect their own income. The result of fighting in the pro-Russian and radical lobby groups is a quite weak reaction of Europe to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

From what is said, we can conclude that pro-Russian lobby in Europe is quite strong. And introduction of more radical sanctions against Russia is a blow against their own economic interests.

Tougher measures are possible when moral-value component of the conflict will take precedence over

the economic and pragmatic component. To all appearances, fire in Mariupol was the threshold that tipped the scales on the side of morality.

- With the symbolic expansion of sanctions opponents of anti-Russia actions activated, too. Is Russia splitting Europe?

- Russia won’t have enough strength to split Europe. Europe is rather defining its position re Russia and Ukraine.

Europe has hung undecided until it elaborates common efficient strategy re Russia’s actions in the region.

- Sanctions against Russia have been acting for quite long time to do certain conclusions: are they a limiting factor or they only made the aggression stronger?

- I would see sanctions against Russia as a limiting factor. Anyway, Russian economy is suffering from them. All players who look upon the situation in the light of economic interests have to take upon themselves consequences of sanctions. Russian government and business have to take into consideration consequences of sanctions and act starting from it, not because of patriotism.

But still we can’t ignore the hysteric component, when every action of the West causes spread-eagle reaction of the population and some politicians with rhetoric a la cold war.

- Germany and its partners in the EU exclude their military intervention into the conflict in Ukraine. However, neither the EU nor the US hurry to help Ukraine with arms to restrain military aggression. Why is it happening?

- There are two possible reasons.

Europe is underestimating long-term nature of Russia-Ukraine conflict, which is common-European now. Western societies tend to interpret this conflict as local warfare between Russia and Ukraine. Some politicians, who understand that Russia-Ukraine conflict is destroying European international relations, react to it tougher, too.

Second reason is the step between fear and responsibility. Any military aid to Ukraine now means transferring of the conflict on a new level, which will be perceived by Russia as another step to confrontation, increase of NATO military presence in the Eastern Europe. Taking into account Moscow’s inadequate and unpredictable decisions, its reaction is hard to predict.

I believe that the West will be refraining from direct military aid to Ukraine, unless the conflict switches to an open military aggression with intervention of regular Russian-identified army into Ukraine.

Other news section «Politics»

Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
The Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum issued a statement on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia.
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan cities.
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
"Case of Zhadan" demonstrated that Belarus does not actually have a clear policy - neither domestic nor foreign.
Belarus
Belarus's Lukashenko alleges “fifth column” plot as unrest continues
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
The relationship between Russia and Belarus has never been an easy one.
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
But even under the circumstances the authorities have various ways out.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
But Lukashenka is afraid for his fate and position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
There should be no actual passport control for the Belarusians arriving in Russia within the framework of the existing Belarusian-Russian agreements.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
It is a process of normalization of Belarus-EU relations. Belarus just fulfils its international commitments.
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Political analyst emphasizes that Belarus is the first modern authoritarianism in the European space, a phenomenon not yet studied by anyone.
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.