Thursday 28 March 2024 | 18:25

Ulad Vialichka: The one who benefited most from the “Normandy four” negotiations was Lukashenka

14.02.2015  |  Politics   |  Aliaksei Jurych, EuroBelarus,  
Ulad Vialichka: The one who benefited most from the “Normandy four” negotiations was Lukashenka

Ukraine can’t combine hostilities with the active phase of reforms – without diminishing the conflict it looks like a war on two fronts.

A fifteen-hour negotiation marathon of the “Normandy four” ended in announcement of the Declaration of the presidents in support of the package for implementation of Minsk agreements adopted on February 12, 2015 and in announcement of the package itself adopted by the contact group on settling the situation in Ukraine. Each party to negotiation explains Minsk agreements to their own benefit.

But are the documents agreed upon in Minsk able to bring peace to Ukraine? Ulad Vialichka, the head of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, comments upon the agreements reached during the Minsk meeting by the “Normandy four”.

- The agreements signed within the frames of “Normandy four” negotiations have been referred to as another ceasefire, but not peace. How do you assess this result?

- For now I tend to agree with this assessment. Despite the fact that the documents were adopted with the assistance of the presidents, all their former actions testified about the intention to continue hostilities, not to stop them. To make conclusions about stable or unstable character of Minsk agreement we should wait until February 15, when the cease-fire is to start working.

It seems that the main goal of the Minsk agreement is to stop the active phase of the military confrontation in Donbas.

- Who has benefited from the new “Minsk agreements”? Illarionov is convinced that Putin got all that he wanted and took no responsibilities upon himself.

- I am not a military expert to make such global conclusions.

The one who benefited most from the “Normandy four” negotiations was Aliaksandr Lukashenka. He won because such kind of agreement was signed in Minsk with participation of the heads of France and Germany. Lukashenka keeps exploiting the topic of “peacemaker” or Belarus as a place for peacemaking negotiations.

The main thing is that the agreement about the ceasefire was reached; if the fire really stops, civilians who are in the zone of military actions will benefit most from it.

- Why did Ukraine agreed upon the initially losing conditions?

- I cannot interpret the agreement in this way; Minsk agreement can be called a compromise. Poroshenko, being interested in cessation of hostilities was aiming for this compromise. Ukraine can’t combine hostilities with the active phase of reforms – without diminishing the conflict it looks like a war on two fronts.

If we consider special status for separate areas of Donetsk and Lugansk regions, it is impossible to think about Minks agreement without this step. We should have expected that these territories would be marked specifically; however, we are talking about federalization, not about autonomy there.

There are some provisions in Minsk agreement, which are impossible to fulfill, such as an obligation to change its Constitution taken by Ukraine, although this is exclusively the prerogative of the Ukrainian people, and no president could take this obligation upon him- or herself.

- Does it mean that those who compare Minsk negotiation with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk for Ukraine are right?

- The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk became the basis for remaking borders. I don’t know to which degree it can be assessed as peace; it was rather a temporary agreement.

In our case we can talk about a formation of a peculiar “Transdniestria” in Ukraine’s body, which explains, why Russia was behaving in such a way.

I wouldn’t hurry to state the fact that these territories are separated from Ukraine, as if the borders were remade, the agreement would somehow touch upon the question of Crimea.

- What situation did the EU put itself into after signing “Minsk agreements”?

- I see no tragic moments in this agreement. At least because I personally don’t understand the role Merkel and Holland were playing: did they represent the heads of France and Germany or did they represent the EU, i.e. did they guarantee the firmness of Russia-Ukraine agreements or did they step as a third force, which forced this or that party to a certain decision?

The role of the EU in signing the Minsk agreement is absolutely unclear.

The only thing that matters to the EU is de-escalation of a military conflict at the territory of its eastern neighbor. I don’t know how much the EU was concerned with the price factor for peace in Ukraine, as well as it’s hard for me to say why the terms of Minsk agreement are such losing for Ukraine.

- What’s next? There are no guarantors of peace; Kremlin that launched the war won the diplomatic round of the war. It seems that Putin freed its hands re further actions in Ukraine.

- We hardly should expect new scenarios of situation development in Ukraine. The main question is how stable are agreements signed in Minsk? If they come to be stable, then we should proceed from the fact that there are territories that don’t live according to Ukraine’s laws and don’t yield to Kiev.

Instability of Minsk negotiations will lead to situation’s kickback, to the renovation of hostilities.

However, we can only start talking about the viability of Minsk agreements in a week or two.

Other news section «Politics»

Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
The Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum issued a statement on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia.
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan cities.
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
"Case of Zhadan" demonstrated that Belarus does not actually have a clear policy - neither domestic nor foreign.
Belarus
Belarus's Lukashenko alleges “fifth column” plot as unrest continues
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
The relationship between Russia and Belarus has never been an easy one.
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
But even under the circumstances the authorities have various ways out.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
But Lukashenka is afraid for his fate and position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
There should be no actual passport control for the Belarusians arriving in Russia within the framework of the existing Belarusian-Russian agreements.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
It is a process of normalization of Belarus-EU relations. Belarus just fulfils its international commitments.
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Political analyst emphasizes that Belarus is the first modern authoritarianism in the European space, a phenomenon not yet studied by anyone.
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.