Thursday 28 March 2024 | 12:19

Ulad Vialichka: Belarus has grounds for closer cooperation with the EU

25.11.2015  |  Society   |  Aliaksei Jurych,  EuroBelarus
Ulad Vialichka: Belarus has grounds for closer cooperation with the EU

In Minsk-Brussels negotiations a peculiar document is elaborated, which consists of 29 negotiations points between Belarus and the EU; however, its content is closed for the public.

On November 20-21 in Kyiv the 7th annual meeting of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum took place.

Ulad Vialichka, Director General of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, was elected to be the Belarusan National Coordinator of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, changing Andrei Yahorau, the head of the “Center for European Transformation” on this position.

Ulad Vialichka and one more representative from Belarus – Nastassia Bekish from Green Network, elected to be the coordinator of 3rd working group of the Forum, became the members of the new Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum.

The election of new co-chairmen of the Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum will take place within the frames of the first meeting of the renewed Steering Committee of the EaP CSF – most likely, in early February 2016; temporarily these powers are performed by Irina Sushko (Ukraine) and Krzysztof Bobiński (Poland).

What are the prospects of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum? Will the policy of the Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF change with the election of the new National Coordinator of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum for Belarus?

Ulad Vialichka answers the questions of the “EuroBelarus” Information Service:

- On November 19-22 the 7th meeting of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum was taking place in Kyiv. This year the traditional assembly lasted a little bit longer than usually, thanks to which we managed to organize a number of discussions on the topical agenda along with the procedural issues (participation of officials, election of coordinators).

For example, a topical issue at this year’s Forum, just like at the few previous ones, has become the counteraction to Kremlin’s propaganda and informational security not only for the sake of the Eastern Partnership countries, but also for a number of the EU states. We also considered the prospects of Belarus’ and Armenia’s rapprochement to the EU standards, taking into account that both the countries haven’t signed the EU Association Agreements. We managed to discuss similar problems with other delegations. At the same time, Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia are, obviously, working on the reformist agenda.

We also discussed the future of the Forum, increased role and influence of this union to other institutional partners such as countries-partners, European Commission, different international structures, such as, for example, the Council of Europe.

I wouldn’t say that we made breakthrough decisions at the Forum; but, obviously, a layer of pro-European organizations and their leaders that speak one language has been formed in our countries: there is common agenda, common understanding of how the EaP lives and what its goals are, and how to use the mechanisms that we have. Well, sometimes there is not enough skills to use these mechanisms.

Seven years haven’t passed in vain. In the beginning of its way Eastern Partnership consisted of six diversified societies of six countries plus the European partners. Now it is a more adequate community with their internal mutual relations, common stances, including public statements. As Ukrainian singer Ruslana said when opening the Forum, we all are a family.

We didn’t manage to solve all the questions, however, I think we managed to bring together and evaluate our common possibilities.

- How do you see the prospects of Belarus’ and Armenia’s Europeanization?

- Both Belarus’ and Armenia’s authorities need to strengthen the vector aimed at cooperation with the EU in order to balance in relations with Russia. Inner political situation in these two countries is a little bit different; but geopolitically, both the countries are living under the strong influence of the “Russian World”, the authorities of our countries are strongly tied with the political interests of Russia and, accordingly, they need Western vector for the freedom of maneuvering. Armenia has chosen its path when Association Agreement has been divided into two separate provisions, each of which Armenia and the EU discuss separately. Armenia isn’t fully signing the Agreement, but is trying to realize separate provisions largely because it doesn’t want to irritate its neighbor.

It’s hard to say whether such scenario will be realized in Belarus. At least the EU is trying to do the same with Azerbaijan by initiating the European dialog on modernization. I think that with the situational thaw in Belarus-Europe relations related to the long-awaited release of political prisoners and absence of mass repressions during the “presidential elections” there is certain ground for closer cooperation with the EU. In this case, the question is, what is the agenda of such negotiations today.

We know about the certain document consisting of 29 provisions that has to do with Belarus-EU relations; however, the content of this document is closed for the public. The two parties explain the reasons of its non-publicity differently, but nevertheless, now some behind-the-scenes discussion of the agenda is going on. All that looks like the situation of 2007-2008, when the document (i.e. “non paper”) “What can the EU give to Belarus?” was published. Back then the EU suggested 7 provisions; now we are talking about 29. Let’s hope that in the near future at least some part of these provisions will become not only the subject-matter of non-official interstate negotiations, but also available for our civil society.

- Has the question about reforming the EaP raised in Kyiv?

- By the highest standards it hasn’t been raised. We have more serious problems that need to be solved now, first of all – stability and security. The EU and other countries are looking for a way to optimize the existing format of the EaP. At the introductory discussion of the Forum the EU Commissioner Johannes Hahn didn’t say anything new, thus confirming the infrastructural approach to the development of the initiative that has been formed earlier.

- Will the policy of the Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF change with the election of you as the new National Coordinator of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum for Belarus?

- I think there is no sense to change the course now. National Platform has planned a number of important actions for making its participants understand their role in new circumstances. I think this work should be continued and enhanced.

National Platform is now working on its own strategic plan for the next three years –everything goes according to the previously planned path. The Steering Committee of the National Platform has been elected as early as this summer and has been actively working all these months, largely thanks to the energy of the effective chairman – Sviatlana Karaliova.

I’m joining this work. My task will, rather, consist of securing the relation between the national and general agendas of the EaP CSF. We should hardly expect anything radically new; now the process of improvement and disillusion as to the understanding of what can really be achieved is going on. And I can introduce more intense communication between different actors in this process. I think that it’s very important that this discussion is of intensive character.

I also want to voice gratitude to my colleague Andrei Yahorau, who has put a lot of effort and ideas to the development of the Forum in general and our National Platform in particular.

As always, hard times are awaiting us, but we are used to that – we just want to see the ultimate goal and believe in it. For me it’s independent and free Belarus, equal and respected in the family of the European nations.

Other news section «Society»

What actually the State List of Historical and Cultural Values gives to Belarusan Heritage Sites?
What actually the State List of Historical and Cultural Values gives to Belarusan Heritage Sites?
The Belarus Committee of ICOMOS announces the collection of cases on the effectiveness of the State List of Historical and Cultural Values as a tool of the safeguarding the cultural monuments.
The right to heritage according to the standards of the Faro Convention: is it possible in Belarus?
The right to heritage according to the standards of the Faro Convention: is it possible in Belarus?
On March 27-28, the Belarus ICOMOS and the EuroBelarus held an online expert workshop on expanding opportunities for community participation in the governance of historical and cultural heritage.
“It is our big joint work”
“It is our big joint work”
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.
The “Agenda 50” campaign was finalised by the Regional Development Forum
The “Agenda 50” campaign was finalised by the Regional Development Forum
The Forum was devoted not so much to the outputs as to the challenges and prospects after the creation and signing of local agendas.
Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool
Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool
To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.
“If a person cannot leave the apartment, he or she does not need an accessible Opera House”
“If a person cannot leave the apartment, he or she does not need an accessible Opera House”
In Stoubcy, they talked about universal design and conducted pilot monitoring of two urban sites accessibility.
Local agenda in Valożyn: mission accomplished
Local agenda in Valożyn: mission accomplished
"Specificity is different, but the priority is general." In Valożyn, a local strategy for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
How Ščučyn was proceeding towards the solution of problems of people with disabilities
How Ščučyn was proceeding towards the solution of problems of people with disabilities
The campaign "Agenda 50" was summed up in Ščučyn, and a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed there.
A program to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities was designed in Stolin
A program to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities was designed in Stolin
The regional center has become the second city in Belarus where the local plan for the implementation of the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
“Agenda 50” in Belarus: from strategies to implementation
“Agenda 50” in Belarus: from strategies to implementation
Representatives of the campaign “Agenda 50” from five pilot cities discussed achievements in creating local agendas for implementing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
In Stoubcy, a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention was signed
In Stoubcy, a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention was signed
It is noteworthy that out of the five pilot cities, Stoubcy was the last to join the campaign “Agenda 50”, but the first one to complete the preparation of the local agenda.
The monitoring of accessibility was presented in Stolin
The monitoring of accessibility was presented in Stolin
On May 28, the city hosted a presentation of the results of the project "Equal to Equal" which was dedicated to monitoring the barrier-free environment in the city.
“They think if the legs don’t function, neither functions the head.”
“They think if the legs don’t function, neither functions the head.”
In Babruysk, wheelchair users are fighting discrimination.
The real work of the Convention depends on all interested communities and organizations
The real work of the Convention depends on all interested communities and organizations
What results has the campaign "Agenda 50" given, what helps to implement the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the regions?
The Convention is a fight against fears, barriers and stigmata
The Convention is a fight against fears, barriers and stigmata
Experts in Valožyn have determined that the quality of people’s life depends on their awareness.
The Convention should become a "living tool”, rather than remaining just an ordinary document
The Convention should become a "living tool”, rather than remaining just an ordinary document
On March 3, members of the campaign "Agenda 50" from different Belarusian cities met in Minsk. The campaign is aimed at the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The main thing is one’s personal motivation for full active life (PHOTOS)
The main thing is one’s personal motivation for full active life (PHOTOS)
There are being implemented three projects under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities campaign in the city of Babruysk.
One man does not make a team, but united we are able to do a lot
One man does not make a team, but united we are able to do a lot
In Ščučyn, people with disabilities learned to be leaders and to advocate their interests.
Barrier-free environment – it is not a ramp, but a means of independence (PHOTOS)
Barrier-free environment – it is not a ramp, but a means of independence (PHOTOS)
In Stolin, social organizations and local authorities are implementing a project aimed at independent living of persons with disabilities, and creating local agenda for the district.
Polish experts: We say “equality” and you say “inclusion”
Polish experts: We say “equality” and you say “inclusion”
Will creation of local agendas be an effective tool in ensuring rights of persons with disabilities in Belarus, just as it was in Poland?
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.