Friday 29 March 2024 | 00:28

Youth civil society organizations still remain invisible

21.01.2016  |  Society   |  Piotr Kuchta,  EuroBelarus
Youth civil society organizations still remain invisible

In this situation, the capacity for cooperation between youth organizations is quite high.

On January 19 the business centre IMAGURU in Minsk hosted the presentation of the results of the study “Non-Governmental Organizations and Initiative Groups for Cooperation in Addressing Common Objectives”.

The study of the youth CSOs sector that also includes the analysis of the role and influence of the external environment is one of the Sectoral analyses that have been conducting by the Office for European Expertise and Communication (OEEC) since 2012. These studies strive to: “to summarize the existing expert and scientific data regarding the development of specific sectors of the Belarusian civil society, and complement it with quantitative and qualitative studies of the aspects, which have not been studied so far”.

The research was carried out by the Center for European Transformation analysts: Andrei Yahorau, Alena Zuikova, Volha Lashkevich, Andrei Shutau, and Sviatlana Antashkevich.

“This analysis aims to estimate the current state and opportunities for enhancing cooperation between Belarusian civil society youth organizations, as well as between these organizations and their environment. The main subject of the survey is the perceptions of joint actions and initiatives by the

leaders and participants of youth sector organizations, i.e. how they see current and future cooperation,” – note in the OEEC.

For almost six months the analysts were studying the sector with the help of electronic questionnaire survey of randomly sampled youth organizations – about 150 questionnaires were sent to 327 youth organizations. Apart from that, 19 in-depth semi-structured interviews with the sector's leaders and activists and one focus group interview, which included seven participants from among activists of youth organizations functioning in Minsk or at the country level were conducted.

According to Andrei Yahorau, the head of the Center for European Transformation, recovery of the database of youth organizations using open information sources was made (out of the collected body of data – over 800 organizations – all sports, dance, gaming (schools, fighting federations and clubs, fitness clubs, dance clubs, etc.) organizations were intentionally excluded, as most frequently they use the legal form of an NGO but do not conduct any activity beyond organizing training sessions. Besides, all children's organizations were excluded).

The comparison of the youth sector in size to other sectors of civil society organizations was defined.  Regarding the number of registered organizations, this is the third (after sports and charity) biggest sector of civil society organizations (or about 11 per cent of all registered NGOs).

The sector of youth NGOs is not the largest by the number of organizations, but pretty large by the number of participants. Young people are not deeply involved in the activity of youth organizations. Youth organizations are virtually invisible for the Belarusian youth. The opportunities offered by youth organizations to youth do not match the needs of young people,” – Andrei Yahorau notes. According to the electronic questionnaire survey, 80% of respondents do not believe that youth organizations and initiatives are well known in the society. At the same time, 70% of the respondents think that people "know something" about youth organizations – either heard, read of them, or participated in their activity. Thus, the respondents of the electronic survey perceive visibility of youth organizations as average. In the interviews respondents are conservative in their estimates: youth organizations are "rather poorly known", "insufficiently known", "not very well known", or "I would not say that they are well known". “I.e. the youth organizations themselves doubt their own popularity,” – Andrei Yahorau notes. In this situation, he believes, “they don’t care much about becoming visible: there is no program of cooperation with media, no policy on work with media, no common use of social network”. “Besides, general situation with legal and political conditions also has its influence; it’s fraught with consequences to attract attention”, – the analyst assumes.

The analyst of the Center for European Transformation Alena Zuikova takes note of the geographical distribution of youth organizations: youth organizations and organizations working with youth are mainly found in Minsk – at least 61% of the registered ones. “It means that organizations can be registered in Minsk, but have national scale and work in some towns and villages from the centre. But in fact, very few civil society organizations work in towns or rural area. Sector representatives note that this is a problem – regions suffer from the lack of youth organizations,” – Alena Zuikova says.

“As for the funding, we found out that access to financial resources is not the most topical issue for youth organizations, – the analyst noted. – At least over the past year, 73% of youth organizations more contacted with donors; besides, almost every organization has an international partner.”

There is a problem with organizations-leaders and individual leaders.

As for the main research issue – cooperation, now it’s rather poor: “Out of more than 300 organizations just about 15 organizations are focal (5%), with 5-10 connections. However, the majority of organizations have few relations: up to 5 permanent partners. The group of focal organizations can be called the "core" of the sector – they are closely interlaced with each other.

However, the networks of their partners are very branched, and remote organizations do not have their own relations with the centre. This is the indication that the sector is poorly consolidated and that it is basically rather a number of independently existing groups (regional and/or thematic). The weakness of

internal relations within the sector is the evidence of the low cooperation capacity of youth organizations in addressing common objectives. However, recently there has been a positive trend of enhancing partner relations and search for topics of common interest to enable cooperation (within the last year, 70% of respondents of the electronic questionnaire survey found new partners).”

Respondents believe that to ensure successful cooperation similar organizations and organizations with similar focus should work together. With that, the main cause of failure in the implementation of joint activities, as seen by respondents, is the difference between organizations' objectives.

“Cooperation as such implies understanding that different organizations can in their differing activities reach common goals. For similar organizations this understanding of common goals occurs easier, while for organizations that are different more effort is needed to achieve such understanding. Correspondingly, at the current stage of the development of youth organizations sector, the capacity for cooperation is higher for organizations possessing common characteristics (such as, thematic focus area, target group) and lower for the organizations, which are more distant from each other. Joint activities of youth organizations associated with the engagement in political processes (lobbying, advocacy, change of legislation) is not a priority for youth organizations. Only 20.8% of youth organizations are involved in such activities. For reasons beyond their control it is hard for youth organizations to successfully influence governmental policy; besides, this can provoke risks for organizations and their members. That is why the capacity of youth organizations for the cooperation is higher in politically neutral projects and activities, while with the increase of the political component in cooperation this capacity decreases,” – the study reads.

Why is the capacity of youth organizations for cooperation is still defined as high? “Still, the leaders have general idea about the common mission, shared understanding of the goals of cooperation, and good interpersonal relationships, which also can be used for establishing cooperation”, – Alena Zuikova believes.

Recommendations:

To be more attractive for youth, youth organizations should better study their "consumers" and identify the basis for their offers to the target group.

Belarusian youth organizations should work more actively in the regions, especially in small towns and in rural areas. Due to the lack of entertainment options outside of the capital young people in the regions have a lot of free time and a big potential for work, as basically they do not know what to do with their free time.

Belarusian youth organizations should pay attention to the fact that today no one of the influential people in youth organizations is able to individually foster consolidation – their influence is too limited. However, joint activities of these people could be effective and encouraging for bringing people and organizations together.

Today youth organizations cannot influence youth and other policies. However, such activities are possible and essential, but only in larger coalitions and in a large-scale cooperation with other clusters of civil society organizations of Belarus.

As external, socio-political conditions are an important factor to be considered by youth organizations while planning and cooperating, the organizations, through public communications, should put the improvement of these conditions on the agenda of their cooperation.

So far, shared vision of the organizations' mission and cooperation goals is just an opportunity. To make it real, youth organizations need to build cooperation through regular joint events that are mostly not politicised – festivals, common forums, and thematic campaigns. And move further, because cooperation of youth organizations should focus on their mission and common values of promoting the interests and protecting the rights of the young people.

Other news section «Society»

What actually the State List of Historical and Cultural Values gives to Belarusan Heritage Sites?
What actually the State List of Historical and Cultural Values gives to Belarusan Heritage Sites?
The Belarus Committee of ICOMOS announces the collection of cases on the effectiveness of the State List of Historical and Cultural Values as a tool of the safeguarding the cultural monuments.
The right to heritage according to the standards of the Faro Convention: is it possible in Belarus?
The right to heritage according to the standards of the Faro Convention: is it possible in Belarus?
On March 27-28, the Belarus ICOMOS and the EuroBelarus held an online expert workshop on expanding opportunities for community participation in the governance of historical and cultural heritage.
“It is our big joint work”
“It is our big joint work”
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.
The “Agenda 50” campaign was finalised by the Regional Development Forum
The “Agenda 50” campaign was finalised by the Regional Development Forum
The Forum was devoted not so much to the outputs as to the challenges and prospects after the creation and signing of local agendas.
Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool
Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool
To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.
“If a person cannot leave the apartment, he or she does not need an accessible Opera House”
“If a person cannot leave the apartment, he or she does not need an accessible Opera House”
In Stoubcy, they talked about universal design and conducted pilot monitoring of two urban sites accessibility.
Local agenda in Valożyn: mission accomplished
Local agenda in Valożyn: mission accomplished
"Specificity is different, but the priority is general." In Valożyn, a local strategy for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
How Ščučyn was proceeding towards the solution of problems of people with disabilities
How Ščučyn was proceeding towards the solution of problems of people with disabilities
The campaign "Agenda 50" was summed up in Ščučyn, and a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed there.
A program to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities was designed in Stolin
A program to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities was designed in Stolin
The regional center has become the second city in Belarus where the local plan for the implementation of the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
“Agenda 50” in Belarus: from strategies to implementation
“Agenda 50” in Belarus: from strategies to implementation
Representatives of the campaign “Agenda 50” from five pilot cities discussed achievements in creating local agendas for implementing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
In Stoubcy, a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention was signed
In Stoubcy, a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention was signed
It is noteworthy that out of the five pilot cities, Stoubcy was the last to join the campaign “Agenda 50”, but the first one to complete the preparation of the local agenda.
The monitoring of accessibility was presented in Stolin
The monitoring of accessibility was presented in Stolin
On May 28, the city hosted a presentation of the results of the project "Equal to Equal" which was dedicated to monitoring the barrier-free environment in the city.
“They think if the legs don’t function, neither functions the head.”
“They think if the legs don’t function, neither functions the head.”
In Babruysk, wheelchair users are fighting discrimination.
The real work of the Convention depends on all interested communities and organizations
The real work of the Convention depends on all interested communities and organizations
What results has the campaign "Agenda 50" given, what helps to implement the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the regions?
The Convention is a fight against fears, barriers and stigmata
The Convention is a fight against fears, barriers and stigmata
Experts in Valožyn have determined that the quality of people’s life depends on their awareness.
The Convention should become a "living tool”, rather than remaining just an ordinary document
The Convention should become a "living tool”, rather than remaining just an ordinary document
On March 3, members of the campaign "Agenda 50" from different Belarusian cities met in Minsk. The campaign is aimed at the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The main thing is one’s personal motivation for full active life (PHOTOS)
The main thing is one’s personal motivation for full active life (PHOTOS)
There are being implemented three projects under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities campaign in the city of Babruysk.
One man does not make a team, but united we are able to do a lot
One man does not make a team, but united we are able to do a lot
In Ščučyn, people with disabilities learned to be leaders and to advocate their interests.
Barrier-free environment – it is not a ramp, but a means of independence (PHOTOS)
Barrier-free environment – it is not a ramp, but a means of independence (PHOTOS)
In Stolin, social organizations and local authorities are implementing a project aimed at independent living of persons with disabilities, and creating local agenda for the district.
Polish experts: We say “equality” and you say “inclusion”
Polish experts: We say “equality” and you say “inclusion”
Will creation of local agendas be an effective tool in ensuring rights of persons with disabilities in Belarus, just as it was in Poland?
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.