The Visegrad Group and Germany Foreign Ministers
Statement on the Eastern Partnership
Bratislava, March 3, 2011
The Foreign Ministers of the Visegrad Group,
namely the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, and Germany met in Bratislava to discuss
the Eastern Partnership. The Ministers of the Visegrad Group reviewed progress
in the implementation of the Eastern Partnership since their last meeting in
Budapest a year ago (2 March, 2010) and appreciated the participation of
Germany at the ministerial meeting and its substantial support for the Eastern
Partnership. The Ministers welcomed an exchange of views on Eastern Partnership
policy with the Foreign Ministers of Eastern Partnership countries, Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine as well as
the High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and
Member of the European Commission for Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policy.
The Ministers reconfirmed their commitment to active engagement in the
Eastern Partnership and interest to shape this process politically. They
committed to continue the preparations for a successful Eastern Partnership
Summit in Warsaw during the Polish EU Presidency.
The Ministers of the Visegrad Group expressed their readiness to share
experience of the Visegrad Group’s countries on reform and transition with the
Eastern partners. They will seek
to explore all possibilities for strengthened Visegrad cooperation in the
Eastern Partnership framework, e.g. joint projects within a multilateral
dimension, and to enhance the activity and visibility of the Visegrad Group
within the Eastern Partnership, including by the International Visegrad Fund
supporting Eastern Partnership initiatives. The activities of the forthcoming
Czech Presidency of the Visegrad Group were highlighted in this respect.
The Ministers underlined that EU credibility as a global actor depended
on its capacity and will in supporting development and reforms in stabilising
its neighbourhood. They called for all EU bilateral activities and support to
the Eastern partners to fall under the aegis of the Eastern Partnership.
They urged to make the Eastern Partnership more effective and visible. They
underlined the active role of the European Commission and the EEAS in the
implementation of the Eastern Partnership. They stressed the need to
strengthen the EEAS structures responsible for the Eastern Partnership and
to allocate sufficient resources.
The Ministers reiterated that a strong long-term relationship between
partners and the EU could only be built only on the basis of full respect
for human rights, democratic standards, and the rule of law in the Eastern
Partnership countries. Withdrawal from democratic standards in specific
countries of the Eastern Partnership was a matter of serious concern. They
committed to pursue an enhanced human rights dialogue with the partner
countries. In this regard they appreciated the importance of the role of the
Civil Society Forum and supported broad participation of its representatives
in the activities of thematic multilateral meetings. The Ministers encouraged
the establishment of national civil society platforms in partner countries.
They considered a structural dialogue with civil society in the partner
countries as a necessary step for their democratic modernisation.
The Ministers welcomed the determination expressed by the Eastern
partners to further engage in both the bilateral and multilateral dimension of
the Eastern Partnership. They acknowledged their aspirations towards
European integration. The degree of
integration will depend upon the depth of political and socio-economic reforms
and EU harmonisation. The Ministers expressed support for Eastern partners´
efforts to this end and encouraged them to accelerate their political
association and further economic reforms which bring them closer to the EU.
They stressed the principles of differentiation and “more for more”,
meaning more EU assistance and resources for Eastern partners ready to go
further and faster in fulfilment of their commitments.
The Ministers noted with satisfaction progress achieved in the bilateral
track. They encouraged Ukraine and the European Commission to finalise
negotiations on the Association Agreement, including the Deep and Comprehensive
Free Trade Area (DCFTA). They welcomed the determination of pro-European
governments in Republic of Moldova and Georgia and their
dedication to advance negotiations on the Association Agreement and to start
negotiations on the DCFTA soon. They welcomed the launch of negotiations on
Association Agreements with Armenia and Azerbaijan.
Implementation of the Comprehensive Institution Building program will have
significant importance for improving administrative capacity of the partner
countries in all areas of cooperation.
Against the
background of ongoing repressions and the first political conviction the
Ministers reiterated their strong call on the authorities in Belarus to immediately release all
political prisoners and to end political repression and harassment of the
opposition, independent media and civil society. As stated in the conclusions
of the Foreign Affairs Council of 31 January 2011, any deepening of the EU
relationship with Belarus is conditional on progress towards respect by the
Belarusian authorities for the principles of democracy, the rule of law and
human rights. The Ministers agreed to continue the dialogue with Belarus,
provided the Belarusian authorities prove their willingness to respect these
principles. They expressed their readiness to consider further targeted
restrictive measures as appropriate unless the regime releases all political
prisoners. They committed to support a new facilitated EU visa policy to the
Belarusian people. They expressed the need to
increase assistance to civil society in Belarus and in this regard the welcomed
the results of the donor conference held in Warsaw, on 2 February 2011.
The Ministers acknowledged that in order to deepen EU political
relations with the Eastern partners, political dialogue needed to intensify,
including using the informal Gymnich, sectoral ministerial or political
director meetings. They also agreed that the Information and Coordination
Group for interested third parties should be effectively involved in
boosting support and assistance for the Eastern Partnership programmes and
activities.
The Ministers recognised the importance of the role of enhancing and
facilitating mobility and people-to-people contacts for the Eastern
partners and expressed their strong support to carry out gradual steps toward full
visa free regime with individual partners subject to political and
technical criteria being met. They also supported the further facilitation of
the visa issuing process as well as extension of the length of stay in the EU
for certain categories of citizens, among others, students and researchers.
They called for enhanced cooperation on asylum, migration and border management
related issues within the Eastern Partnership.
The Ministers encouraged the development of economic ties and networks with the partner countries including by promoting direct
foreign investment. They welcomed the launch of the Eastern Partners
Facility and the Eastern Partnership Technical Assistance Trust Fund,
as well as the idea to establish the Eastern Partnership Business Forum.
They expressed their support for partners’ participation in EU programs and
agencies as well as increased sectoral cooperation with the long-term
goal of integration into the EU internal market. They welcomed the
readiness of the partner countries to secure their energy supplies and interest
to discuss specific interconnection and energy diversification projects and
modernise existing transit routes.
The Ministers called for the adequate financing of
EU policy towards the Eastern partners in the next Financial Perspective.
They called for merit-based differentiation within the ENP budgeting on the
basis of more transparent and objective criteria. Specific financial support
should be introduced for the most advanced partners implementing the EU acquis.
The Ministers acknowledged the Eastern Partnership as
added value to the fostering multilateral cooperation. Additional
efforts by all stakeholders were needed so that multilateral platforms, panels
and flagship initiatives could be more operational, target oriented, and able
to deliver visible outcomes that meet interests, ambitions and efforts of both
the partner countries and the EU. The Ministers supported the idea of creating
and attaching to the Warsaw Summit Declaration an annex with a list of key
initiatives and projects that should be further elaborated by the
Commission and implemented in the framework of the current as well as the next
Financial Perspective.
The Ministers encouraged the European Parliament to
activate the EURONEST Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of the
Regions to establish the Eastern Partnership Conference of Regional and
Local Authorities in order to strengthen engagement of important actors
from the partner countries on implementation of the Eastern Partnership.
The Ministers of the Czech Republic, Hungary,
Poland and Slovakia agreed to meet on the Eastern Partnership in the spring
2012.
All the arguments of opposition politicians for taking part in the elections resemble are rather self-justifications and attempts to find some space for themselves in this difficult political situation, believes the head of the Board of the...
«I don’t see any crime in the attempt of Belarusan police to learn something from German police. Everyone - from the highest ranks to the lowest ones - simply has to observe the law». Miachyslau Gryb, former Speaker of the Supreme Council of Belarus,...
We invite you to participate in a second edition of a unique and extraordinary contest for reporters, The Eastern Partnership Journalism Prize. If you are a journalist from one of the countries of Eastern Partnership (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus,...
Belarus is on the way to reaching a deadlock in all the directions, while the modernization of the country should be started with political reforms. And the first thing to do is to reject the authoritarian system of government in order to make it...
Policy field Global governance, International Cooperation, Development Target groups International Organisations, Government bodies, Academic institutions, Civil Society Organisations, Private Sector Organisations, Foundations, individuals. Period of...
Trans Cultura Foundation (Poland) together with Workshops of Culture (Poland) and partners: Suburb Cultural Centre (Armenia), United Artits’ Club (Azerbaijan), Lohvinau Publishing House (Belarus), GeoAIR (Georgia), Young Artists Asociation «Oberliht»...
The number of registered candidates representing opposition parties is on the average not much higher than that during previous parliamentary elections. Such an opinion was expressed to the Information Service of «EuroBelarus» by political scientist...
The first half of 2012 saw the main trend in the political democratization and liberalization segment carry on from the year 2011, as stagnation continued. There were new manifestations of administrative and criminal prosecution of democratic...
Basta is a social enterprise outside Stockholm. It began in 1994 helping people move away from drugs and criminality through qualified work, housing, and a meaningful spare time. Basta is a client-run social enterprise - in theory as well as in...
In early September, a presentation of the Flying University program for the new school year will be held. As recently experts have repeatedly talked about the problems of the Belarusian higher education, expanding the Flying University program requires...
The processes of political, economic, and cultural change in Europe have had a particularly strong impact upon the countries of Eastern Europe and their neighbours in the east. It is timely to reflect on and debate the ways in which Europe and the...
The sentence on the Pussy Riot band members demonstrates nonobservance of constitutional norm of secularism of the Russian state, supposes Uladzimir Matskevich, the head of the Board of the International Consortium «EuroBelarus
Next serial staff changes have been taking place in higher levels of the Belarusian government: Piotr Prokopovich [former Chairman of the Board of the National Bank of Belarus – EuroBelarus] was appointed as assistant to the President, and the...
The chairman of the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" Ulad Vialichka hopes that a diplomatic conflict with Sweden may calm down in a few months. However, it is very difficult, in his view, to accurately predict the development of bilateral...
The situation around the Belarusian authorities’ decision on the list of persons banned from travelling abroad looks not quite understood. On the one hand, a number of civil society activists and opposition politicians - Valiantsin Stefanovich, Andrei...
After Belarusian and Russian governments have signed the contract for construction of the nuclear power plant (NPP) in the Astravets district, and the cornerstone was laid on the site, the mission of anti-nuclear ecologists is not over. In contrast, it...
Youth internet forum "I am the leader!" organized by the Belarusian Republican Youth Union (BRSM) in the framework of the preparation for the election to the parliament took place in Minsk on August 16. The Forum organizers have gathered about 200...
Some participants of the current election campaign voice so many platitudes that induce the head of the Board of the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" Uladzimir Matskevich to speak directly and categorically, "Your experience, gentlemen, is scanty...
Chatham House, in partnership with the Robert Bosch Stiftung, invites scholars from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine to apply for a Visiting Fellowship at Chatham House in London.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.