In January-October foreign exchange earnings declined by $9 billion compared to the same period last year. The former head of the National Bank explains the reasons and consequences of this process.
– Economists explain decrease of export income by the decline in the demand for Belarusian goods in Russia, and the reduction of income from domestic currency trade – by the policy of the National Bank of de-dollarization of the economy. What's the reason for that, in your opinion?
– The main reason is sales slump in foreign markets. This is not a question of the last few months, but of the whole year. We have a constant decline in exports and, as the evidence of the lack of competitiveness of the Belarusian economy. At the same time, according to statistics, the balance of foreign trade turnover, including exports of goods and services, remains positive, so the decline in revenues does not have such a strong influence, for example, on the national currency rate, as it could have.
– Nevertheless, the situation is getting worse. What are the consequences of the reduction of foreign exchange earnings?
– The consequences are already visible. They are the decline of gross domestic product, the level of income of the population, deprecation of salaries, deprecation of the national currency and inflation. That what has been happening since the beginning of the year and is lasting today.
– How do you see a way out of this situation?
– Conducting comprehensive economic reforms could be a way out. That means the revival of the economy, without which it is impossible to reduce the amount of taxation. That is the improvement in the climate for foreign direct investments with new technologies, new equipment. That’s everything that has been suggested by the United Civil Party in its program “One million new jobs” and other anti-crisis programs. They include a whole range of reforms, which are impossible without changes in the field of public administration and political sphere, starting with holding free fair elections, competitive election or appointment of officials, including the directors of enterprises, employees of ministries and departments. That means openness and transparency of government activities, openness of information on the budget, where does the money from country’s loans are spent. This is the change in the pattern of economic and political development of the country.
The interview was originally published at ucpb.org
The Belarusian government has invited the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to prepare five large state-owned companies for privatization.
Officially, the unemployment in our country is reducing – if judging by the number of registrations at the labor exchange; however, the number of jobs doesn’t increase in the economy.
Recently Belarus State Military Industrial Committee announced that in the first half of 2016 its enterprises earned a net profit of $80m, thus over-fulfilling the assigned export plans by a quarter.
Poor economic conditions in the countryside, restrictions, unfair competition, inefficiency of state-owned agricultural enterprises also contribute to this ‘success story’, writes Aliaksandr Filipau.
On 20 June Lukashenka met with vice-chair and president of the Chinese CITIC Group Corporation Wang Jiong; it seems especially important in light of Lukashenka’s planned visit to China in September.
All the conditions for everyone to be able to earn a decent salary have been enabled in Belarus, however, it is necessary to make some effort to get the money, assumes the president.
Belarus is losing currency earnings – in the 6 months of 2016 the country earned 3 billion less than in the same period in 2015. Instead of removing the causes of the flop the state relies on magic.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.