BISS presents the seventh issue of the polling memorandum series based on the public opinion poll data of the Independent Institute for Social, Economic and Political Studies (IISEPS).
Surprising good news for Europe: for the first time since June 2011 Belarusians would prefer a European choice. No winner appeared in the opposition’s controversy whether to boycott parliamentary elections or to participate. BISS considers those to be the two main outcomes of the latest polling data provided by IISEPS (Institute for Socio-Economic and Political Studies).
If asked to vote in a referendum for a union with Russia or for joining the EU, 44.1% voted for the EU and 36.2% for Russia in October 2012. This is the largest surprise of the poll, coming one year after a steep fall of pro-EU sentiment and increasing pro-Russia sentiment (March 2011-March 2012), a trend which has started back in the second quarter of 2012. BISS attributes this shift to various factors (see below), including the EU’s changed post-2010 elections rhetoric and, especially, launching its “Dialogue for Modernization” (March 2012). The latest polling data may send a message to Brussels and other European capitals that the EU could have a reasonable influence in the country.
66.4% of respondents in IISEPS’s poll said they voted in the parliamentary elections, which is less than the officially announced turnout but more than reported by opposition party observers and more than the percentage of voters that had planned to vote in the elections in June 2012. The 9% of voters who supported a boycott of the parliamentary elections did not even match the number of those who claimed such a position before elections. The 7% who voted for opposition candidates fell short of the 28% of voters who considered voted for opposition candidates before the elections (according to pre-elections polls). Thus, BISS sees this as a bitter win-win for both those advocating a boycott as well as for those who decided to stay in the race for campaigning purposes.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.