In the independent Belarus the influence of pro-Russian organizations and movements will be gradually decreasing.
This opinion in the talk with the EuroBelarus Information Service showed the philosopher Valiantsin Akudovich.
Even for the first twenty years of independence when connections with Russia have been rather strong, Belarus hasn’t formed any political party that would support our country’s annexation to Russia.
“It is, by the way, very surprising, - noted Valiantsin Akudovich. – As sociology shows that almost 40 per cent support close relations with Russia. I.e. there exists electorate basis for that. And yet, none of the politicians has dared to use it”.
There can be lots of reasons for that. The philosopher believes that the main one is that “most Belarusans have a gene of independence lying somewhere deep. It doesn’t show itself formally, as they can be negative about Belarusan language, can be for the union with Russia in many different formats. But they do not respond to the idea of becoming part of Russia”.
One more important moment is that Belarusan authorities do not support such initiative either, assumes the interlocutor. “Aliaksandr Lukashenka wants to control his relations with Russia; he wants to be the greatest pro-Russian politician”. Of course, the measure of pro-Russian politics is at the level where Belarusan leader finds it safe to hold power.
However, highlighted Valiantsin Akudovich, Aliaksandr Lukashenka’s personality is not the main hindrance for the development of pro-Russian organizations in Belarus: “As he was ready to make this treachery in case he would have become the Russian leader. But the main thing is that Belarusans don’t want to be Russia anymore”.
It is logical that in such circumstances there is no future for pro-Russian organizations in Belarus. “As with each year, even each month independence only strengthens. It is unheard that the society of some independent country suddenly would start moving back from its independence. There is no such thing in the history and there will never be it”, - forecasted the philosopher.
He allows for the possibility that some new pro-Russian organizations and initiatives may recur. “But this movement won’t get force and development”, - said the interlocutor. He believes that the return of Belarus to the Russian political discourse is only possible in case of intervention. Moreover, Russia is not interested in Belarus as a territory for annexation. Our eastern neighbor would sooner limit itself to attaching Belarus in some other form like the Customs Union, for instance. On the whole, “Belarus is already destined to remain independent”, - assumes Valiantsin Akudovich.
“There is no doubt that Kremlin will never yield to Belarus, - noticed the philosopher. – But I don’t think that he will do it through formation and support of some pro-Russian organizations. It is more likely to be done through economic, diplomatic, financial pressure”.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.