With all the efforts aimed at putting civil society under control, Russian authorities will hardly undertake the tough arrangements similar to those currently employed by the Belarusan authorities.
This opinion shared with the EuroBelarus Information Service the director of the Institute for Policy Studies Palіtychnaya Sphera (Political Sphere) Andrei Kazakevich.
Recently Russian civil society is being increasingly inspected by the state by means of the stick and carrot politics, employed by the Russian authorities. After the law on non-governmental organizations rated as “foreign agents” has been adopted, civil society structures were invaded with the prosecutor’s inspections. At the same time, on March 30 the President Vladimir Putin signed an order about the government assistance of socially oriented NGOs in 2013.
Is it appropriate to say that the Russian authorities adopt Belarusan methods in their struggle with the civil society?
Andrei Kazakevich believes that the main mechanism with the help of which civil society can be easily manipulated is not the control of the cash flow but rather creation of unfavorable conditions for the work of public organizations.
“For instance, organizations can be deprived of registration as well as the possibility to hire an office and conduct public events. And if all the above mentioned is being carried out, then control of the cash flow is not of such big importance”, - noted the political scientist.
He believes that the Russian authorities have every possibility for such steps. However, Andrei Kazakevich assessed the probability that the official Moscow will make use of the same tough methods Belarusan authorities employed as highly improbable.
Lately the “All-Russia People's Front” movement, initiated by Vladimir Putin, is rapidly developing. Will it become a certain copy of the “Belaya Rus” organization that is functioning in Belarus?
“For now it is hard to say what look will this organization acquire, - said Andrei Kazakevich. – But it will hardly copy “Belaya Rus”, as it is the Belarusan organization that has been formed according to the pattern of the “All-Russia People's Front”. “Belaya Rus” should have developed in some kind of “party in office”, but this idea was blocked later on and is being blocked to this day”.
“I don’t think that Russia will take the course of producing yet another bureaucratic structure within NGO. I assume that more subtle game will be played there, involving the formation of coalitions instead of creating some pro-Putin superstructure”, - the political scientist made his forecast.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.