The leader of the Belarusan Popular Front believes that the intention to hold a “people’s referendum” is aimed at securing changes in people's minds and the country's political system.
The only way for pro-democratic forces to come to power in Belarus is to receive as much support from the public as possible, Janukevich told at a meeting of its Council in Minsk on May 25. "Hoping that the country's isolation will lead to disturbances that will force the authorities to make changes is a mistake," he said, adding that economic crises normally prompted Belarusans to emigrate rather than take part in street protests, reports BelaPAN.
The "people's referendum" idea "at least gives an answer how we can influence the situation through popular support," he said. "People should know that there's a force that thinks about them rather than about its own problems that seem abstract to the majority. Each person signing a petition in support of the referendum may mean the voter's switch from the position of neutrality to support for forces that want changes”, - Janukevich claims.
The politician described opposition forces' infighting as counterproductive. "The opposition is now divided, which has a bad impact on its strength both inside Belarus and abroad. Even those who are ready to support the opposition cannot always say that one should give ear to its opinion," he said.
According to Janukevich, it is impossible for all opposition forces to unite at present. "But we can show that there are organizations that are ready to reach agreement. This can restore faith in Belarusan democracy, our partners' faith in us," he added.
Let us recall that recently the “Tell the Truth!” movement, the Movement for Freedom and the Belarusan Popular Front announced that they had decided on long-term strategic partnership and would cooperate during the next local, presidential and parliamentary elections at the very least and hold the people’s referendum. They said that the referendum questions would be formulated by the following local elections, which should be held no later than March 2014. The collection of signatures for holding the referendum would begin during the local elections, and the referendum issues would be reflected in the election platforms of the three organizations’ candidates.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.