Russia has nothing against improvement of relations between Belarus and the EU, but it can’t accept destruction of its integration projects and decrease of its military capability.
Such opinion in the talk with the EuroBelarus Information Service expressed Andrei Kazakevich, the director of the Institute for Policy Studies Palіtychnaya Sphera (Political Sphere).
Let us recall that during the meeting with Sergei Naryshkin, the Chairman of the Russian State Duma Aliaksandr Lukashenka stated about the necessity to develop relations with the EU, but in case it is done without prejudice to the interests of the country’s major ally – Russia.
“Falling under the complete control of Russia is disadvantageous for Belarus, as it presupposes both the loss of power and the opportunity for maneuvers. That is why Belarus together with the other countries should find balance between EU and Russia that will give our country certain stability”, - Andrei Kazakevich said.
The statement made by the president can be considered a signal to find such balance in foreign policy relations, the expert believes; though he admits that it can contradict Russian interests to some degree. “Russia is ready for Belarus to support such balance in case some strategic issues are guaranteed to it, and that becomes the reason for discussion”, - the political scientist noted.
Where does the borderline of Belarus-EU cooperation, the crossing of which is not supported by Russia, lie?
“This borderline can be relocated, - Andrei Kazakevich noticed. – However, for now Russia can’t accept Belarus’ withdrawal from Eurasian integration projects, as well as wider cooperation between Belarus and NATO. The problems can also appear if the military cooperation with Russia and status of Russian defense facilities will be questioned”.
Andrei Kazakevich allows that the Lukashenka’s remark can be addressed to the European politicians, too, “in order to demonstrate that Belarus looks upon Europe as upon important political partner and won’t entirely follow Russian politics”.
But does it mean that after these words Europe can count on certain steps and actions taken by Belarusan authorities?
“They can be taken, - the expert admits. –Some features of that are noticeable, and certain improvements in Belarus-EU relations are quite possible now, though we shouldn’t wait dramatic and irreversible changes in both official and informal relations in this direction”.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.