Russian society shares Kremlin’s position to continue with aggression in Ukraine; thus, the international community shouldn’t fear that sanctions would affect broad strata of society.
How efficient are sanctions introduced by the US and the EU against Russia? “EuroBelarus” Information Service asked Andrei Yahorau, the head of the Centre for European Transformation, to share his viewpoint.
- The US introduced sanctions, and the EU coordinated the following round of sanctions against Russia. How efficient are these measures? Will they make Kremlin abandon its plans on aggression against Ukraine?
- These sanctions are aimed exactly at the prevention of Russian aggression in Ukraine. It is to stop military actions of gunmen at the territory of the eastern Ukraine that served as a reason for the following round of sanctions.
Conversely, Russia implemented a new round of expansion, basically starting an open military invasion into Ukraine, and new round of sanctions is introduced as a response to such actions.
As a response to the sanctions, a drop in prices of Russian companies and the depreciation of the Russian ruble already occurred at the Russian markets.
- What measures can give actual effect?
- We are to use the whole range of measures, which are at the disposal of the international community.
We should realize that the Russian elites and the Russian society are consolidated in terms of continuation of Russian aggression in Ukraine; they are not going to surrender. Now Russia can take a defensive stance; but even if the Russian authorities and the Russian society are ready for the sanctions, it won’t reduce their efficiency if the international community takes a serious stance. Russian society shares Kremlin’s position to continue the war in Ukraine; thus, the international community shouldn’t fear that sanctions would affect broad strata of society.
- Immediately after the sanctions were introduced, Lithuania President Dalia Grybauskaitė said that they are insufficient. What did she mean by that?
- Sanctions applied earlier were personal and specific; they didn’t affect Russia’s economic or political situation. And we need sanctions that would noticeably affect the resources of the Russian regime. Let me repeat: Russian society shares Kremlin’s position, which is to continue with aggression in Ukraine; so the international community shouldn’t fear that sanctions would affect broad strata of society.
- Some Belarusan politicians believe that sanctions against Russia will make Lukashenka adjust his obviously pro-Russian foreign policy course. How feasible is that?
- These sanctions will make Belarus act slightly differently only if Belarus experiences the negative influence of these sanctions. Lukashenka won’t turn away from Russia only because sanctions against it are imposed, as Lukashenka himself is liable to the international sanctions since 1996.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.