23.07.2014 |Politics| EuroBelarus Information Service,
Belarus Foreign Minister in Brussels stated about the importance of engaging Russia in the EaP activities in order to “avoid creation of new dividing lines in the region”.
Belarusan Foreign Minister also discussed the current issues and opportunities of developing cooperation between Belarus and the European partners at the EU and bilateral level.
As“EuroBelarus” Information Service has already reported, on July 22, 2014 Uladzimir Makei, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, took part in the Eastern Partnership Ministerial Meeting.
Among the participants of the meeting were High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton, European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighborhood Policy Stefan Fule, Foreign Ministers of the EU Member States and the EaP Partner Countries.
According to the press service of the Belarus Foreign Ministry, the Ministerial Meeting focused on the EaP implementation after the 2013 Vilnius Summit as well as the prospects of future development and possible reformatting taking into account the current situation in the region and the signing by Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine of the Association Agreements with the EU. The ministers also discussed preparation for the EaP forth Summit to be held in Riga (Latvia) on 22 May 2015.
In his plenary statement Uladzimir Makei outlined Belarus’ principal approaches towards the development of the relations with the European Union and participation in the Eastern Partnership. He stressed the necessity for a greater differentiation in the relations of the EU with the EaP Partner Countries with account taken of their needs, interests and integration aspirations. Particular attention was drawn to the importance of harmonizing different integration processes and engaging third countries, first of all Russia, in the EaP activities in order to avoid creation of new dividing lines in the region.
Let us recall that in June the conference of the Belarusan National Platform of Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum was held in Minsk. During this meeting it was suggested that the “Eastern Partnership” program can cease to exist, as the Belarusan civil society should be ready for the work in the new situation.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.