No matter whether it was spontaneous or deliberate, the statement made by Maira Moira in support of Aliaksandr Lukashenka voiced on the TV will be used by the Belarusan propaganda to the full.
When the Head of EU Delegation to Belarus Ambassador Maira Mora called for the Belarusans to “support your president” it agitated the whole democratic community in the country. The phrase that was voiced during the discussion of the war in Ukraine was perceived as an intervention of the European Ambassador into Belarus’ internal affairs. At the same time, the official propaganda presents it as a call of the EU to vote for Lukashenka at the president election in 2015.
Why did the diplomat of such high level made such a “careless” remark? Or is it a Freudian slip? What might these thoughtless words bring Belarus?
Ulad Vialichka, the head of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, shared his understanding of the situation with “EuroBelarus” Information Service.
“Belarusans, you peaceful people, support your President so that there is no more war in your neighboring country”, - claimed a representative of the EU in Belarus Maira Mora on ONT (“Nationwide TV”). How can you assess this public statement made by the EU representative?
- Trying to access the situation, I watched the programme once more, so that to understand the context and the sense of the message. The programme dealt with military actions in Ukraine, and, naturally, as any human, Maira Mora voiced the aspiration for furthering the end of the war, but the choice of words was extremely unsuccessful, and now she has to pay for it. From my point of view, it is human factor and lack of experience in public speaking that is to blame. Nevertheless, the diplomat of such high level cannot but understands that such words offend civil and political activists of our country, political prisoners and their families.
- On the threshold of the president election campaign the official propaganda cut the phrase of Maira Mora to “Belarusans, support your President”. Most of the Belarusans who aren’t bound to go into the root of the political nuances, will understand this phrase as a direct call of the EU to vote for Lukashenka…
- Well, the words of the European Ambassador can be interpreted in this way. Statements of the EU official person, who calls Lukashenka “President” and who also calls for supporting him, can be interpreted in favor of the Belarusan authorities, whatever the contexts are. Thus, the official person of the EU intervenes into Belarus’ inner political situation and directly or not, but expresses the liking for the current authorities, despite the non-recognition of the latest president elections and its results, as well as unclear barriers in Belarus-EU relations.
- Perhaps, we shouldn’t look for deep implications in this phrase? The EU thanks Lukashenka for the efforts in reaching peace in Donbas; Belarusan officials are warmly welcomed in the West. De jure, formal sanctions against official Minsk are preserved, but de facto the EU sees Lukashenka not as the last dictator in Europe, but as Europe’s favourite.
- I wouldn’t be reviewing the state of EU-Belarus relations basing on this TV-precedent. Naturally, with all the violence and tough crisis in Ukraine (humanitarian catastrophe, human tragedy) quiet Belarus looks more attractive as a partner for communication. However, I don’t think that Belarusan officials are much welcomed in Europe. The cooperation between them is rather of more technical, expert, and non-political character.
The EU has voiced its gratefulness for the organization of negotiations in Minsk; however, in reality it is a mere diplomatic politeness. At the same time, problems, which used to inhibit Belarus-Europe relations, still remain. The EU cannot but look for ways to warm up these relations because of their pragmatic interests, but there everything has its own limit. As we are all humans, our rhetoric often reveals our values. I am surprised at the fact that the EU Ambassador took part in the official talk show of the National Belarusian TV-channel. Frankly speaking, I can’t recall when diplomats of such level participated in such kind of TV-programmes. Such things weren’t practiced for a long time, and when it happened – I have no idea what we should think about it. Ukraine is a very important issue for discussing; but why did we hear exactly these words from the EU representative on the Belarusan TV? But we had better looked for the intrigue in the Belarusan ideological machine that used the EU diplomat in its interests.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.