Kyrgyzstan has signed an accession agreement to join the Russian-led Eurasia Economic Union (EEU), which comes into effect on January 1.
However, as President Vladimir Putin met in Moscow with leaders of the four other former Soviet republics forming the new alliance, the group already showed signs of divisions, writes RFE/RL.
The new union, which is an expansion of the Customs Union grouping together Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, also includes Armenia and Kyrgyzstan.
In signing the new accord on December 23, Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambaev expressed hope that his country would become a full member by May 2015.
Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian had already signed an agreement to join the group in October in Minsk.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said the new union would have a combined economic output of $4.5 trillion and bring together 170 million people.
"All the participants of this integration process are already experiencing its real benefits," Putin said. "We are convinced that Armenia and Kyrgyzstan's membership in the Eurasian [Economic] Union meets the key national interests of both countries."
In addition to free trade, the union is to coordinate the members' financial systems and regulate their industrial and agricultural policies along with labor markets and transportation networks.
But Belarusian President Aliaksandr Lukashenka sharply criticized Moscow for a trade dispute with Minsk.
Let us recall that Moscow has banned imports of food products from the European Union as a response to Western sanctions against Russia over its activities in Ukraine.
Also on December 23, Moscow hosted a summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).
The regional security grouping comprises Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.
Putin said the gathering was happening at a "difficult time," calling on members of the grouping to take coordinated action to enhance their security.
"Old problems are escalating and new ones are emerging," Putin said, adding that a "deformation of the global security system has been taking place”, adding that "this requires the CSTO states to take coordinated and collective measures aimed at maintaining security in our countries and in our region as a whole."
Lukashenka said the situation near CSTO borders "has never been as tense and explosive as it is today."
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.