In the near future, Belarus is hoping to increase pressure on Brussels via loyal EU Member States, such as Austria, and via other post-Soviet countries.
The Belarusan authorities have enhanced contacts with the most loyal European capitals, Vienna and Budapest. In addition, the authorities have used international fora to send conflicting messages – at the UN they said that there were no human rights issues which deserved special attention to the situation in Belarus, and while meeting with EU representatives, that they were willing to meet Brussels’ requirements. The Belarusan authorities are convinced they would make the EU to play by their rules and normalise relations without fulfilling political conditions and releasing political prisoners.
On May 4th, President Lukashenka and Foreign Minister Makei met with Austria’s Federal Minister for European Integration and Foreign Affairs Sebastian Kurz. After the meeting, the Foreign Minister said that Belarus and the European Union should think about a new strategy for their relations and make concrete steps towards each other.
Belarus has reiterated some ideas, which were used during the previous thaw in Belarus-EU relations in 2008-2010. For example, Foreign Minister Makei underscored that there were some problems with the existing system of power and that Belarus was ready to learn about democracy: “we do not think we are an ideal country and we are willing to learn from our more advanced partners. But we believe that this should be done in an open, frank, direct and sincere dialogue”.
The Belarusan authorities anticipate that the EU Member States where foreign policy officials have changed since 2010 will accept the new ‘old strategy’. However, this time, the Belarusan authorities are not ready for decorative changes in domestic policy and for relaxing the grip on the opposition. Despite official statements of Belarus’s readiness to learn democracy and striving to become a ‘European nation’ the authorities have stiffen penalty for former presidential candidate, political prisoner Mikola Statkevich.
The Belarusan authorities are stepping up contacts with the most loyal EU capitals in order to strengthen their position and role in the regional context. For example, at the meeting between Belarusan Foreign Minister Makei and his Hungarian counterpart Peter Siyyarto, Makei underscored Belarus’ role as a mediator in Russo-European relations: “We see Belarus as a bridge between the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union”. In addition, Deputy Foreign Minister Kupchina in an interview with the Hungarian Magyar Hirlap talked about Belarus’ desire to move closer to the EU but on Belarus’ terms: “we would like to establish as a ‘European nation’ without blood, social unrest and economic collapse”.
Meanwhile, at the UN, the Belarusan delegation declared that there were no human rights issues in Belarus, that the electoral legislation had improved, and that amid conflict in Ukraine, Belarusan society required stability and a strong state. While speaking at the UN Human Rights Council, Belarus’ Deputy Foreign Minister Rybakou said, that “thanks to strong government and effective public policy” Belarus “is an island of peace, tranquility and order” in a difficult geopolitical environment.
In addition, the Belarusan authorities have attempted to pre-empt criticism of the presidential elections by the international community with introducing cosmetic changes in the election legislation, which would not affect the usual electoral practices.
In turn, the opposition is attempting to use their connections in the EU in order not to allow unconditional normalisation of relations between Minsk and Brussels. For instance, Östgruppen, Swedish human rights organization called upon resignation of Head of EU Delegation to Belarus Maira Mora. In the past, the Belarusan opposition had repeatedly accused Myra Mora of not taking a strong stance on the release of political prisoners.
In the near future, Belarus is hoping to increase pressure on Brussels via loyal EU Member States, such as Austria, and via other post-Soviet countries.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.