BISS prepared the thirty-first issue of Belarus Foreign Policy Index, in which they review the country’s foreign policy in the five key dimensions during the period of March – April 2016.
In Belarus’s relationship with Russia compromise was reached in quite a few cooperation areas. Minsk was using the available EEU instruments with more confidence and subtlety, gradually gaining more authority in the bloc.
Belarus continued lobbying its interests via heads of Russian regions. These arrangements facilitated a partial recovery of two-way trade. Following the lifting of the EU sanctions, the bilateral relations with Europe entered a new quality phase. No fundamental changes took place; however, the agenda for further deepening and expansion in the relationship was being built on a more systemic basis. The level of diplomatic contacts kept increasing.
The relations with China continue developing in the “declarative” track. The Belarusian administration and Chinese companies operating in Belarus seek to adapt to the tightening of China’s financial policy and come up with new formats for investing in Belarus.
They have not made much progress, though. The military and military-technical component of Belarus’s relationship with the developing world grew more significant.
In the Middle East, Belarus continued its efforts seeking convergence with the conservative Arab regimes and their allies. The relations with the Latin American countries are still in decline. Belarus not only finds it difficult to identify new partners and projects, but also faces challenges when trying to protect the interests of Belarusian companies. Minsk has redoubled its efforts to promote its relations with African and Southeast Asian countries.
In the Ukrainian dimension, a slack period was observed in the political sector, whereas economic contacts kept developing at a high pace. A new “trade war” was over, and new areas for economic engagement were outlined.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.