The problems between Belarus and Russia are not getting solved, and the tension is growing and becoming aggravated.
On November 17 in Minsk Alexander Lukashenka held a press conference for Russian journalists and bloggers. He was replying to their questions for more than five hours.
Did Russian journalists hear anything new? What is the meaning behind such events? Should we see any significance in Lukashenka’s “confessions”?
Uladzimir Matskevich, philosopher and methodologist, replied to the questions of "EuroBelarus" Information Service.
- I have never seen a single press conference held by Lukashenka for the Russian journalists. I always get to know about such events post factum.
After reading reports on this press conference I concluded that there was no significant information mentioned, as if there are neither any problems in Belarus itself, nor in the Minsk-Russia relations nor in the world overall. In general, all the meetings with Russian journalists are simply showing off, Lukashenka being narcissistic in front of the audience ready to applaud. The only consequence of such events is the pro-Lukashenka electorate, Lukashenka public cooing over what a nice, talkative, folksy president we have.
- Russian journalists were beckoned to Minsk at the times of strained relations with Moscow. This time the press conference was also held right before the meeting with Vladimir Putin. Maybe Lukashenka wanted to convey his position to the Kremlin?
- Putin is unlikely to pay attention to this kind of show. He has enough information on what Lukashenka is doing or is going to do; reliable information comes from the Russian agents in Lukashenka’s surroundings and analytical agencies that dismantle the statements and actions taken by the President of Belarus.
But I would like to draw attention to the fact that Lukashenka have not held such meetings for a long time and absolutely could not have them at the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and during the escalation of the conflict when he had absolutely nothing to say to the Russian regional journalists and the Russian public. Now Lukashenka repeated all the theses voiced before: his love for Russia, the family-like relationship of the Belarusians and Russians - all the prejudices and myths the Belarusian official ideology is based on.
- Is it possible to formulate the preliminary agenda of the talks between Putin and Lukashenka?
- It will be a meeting of two international pariahs, two outsiders, two European losers. Of course, they will talk about how to overcome the difficulties of the economic sanctions imposed on both Russia and Belarus.
The Belarusian regime subsidized by the Russian regime will ask for some help: granting another loan, removing the restrictions on trading Belarusian goods, which could be included in the Russian import program.
And same as always there is a question of the price for hydrocarbons the Belarusian exports and economy depend on, the issue of lifting the tariff and customs restrictions on the supply of Belarusian goods to the Russian market will be discussed. Russia is completely not interested in the Belarusian market as the share in exports is highly insignificant. But Moscow is still worried, interested and concerned by Belarus as a geostrategic foothold. Russia is ready to make some economic concessions, ready to pay for the loyalty of the Belarusian regime for the sake of the Russian military presence and using the territory of Belarus for the needs of foreign and military policy.
- What will Moscow demand in exchange for political loyalty this time?
- Belarus is already making some steps in the direction of Russia in advance: for example, the Belarusian delegation at the UN tried to block the resolution condemning the occupation of Crimea and to take off the entire range of issues put to a vote.
- Did Lukashenka accidentally let the phrase that he is ready to hold elections in Donbass slip?
- No, of course it was not an accident. The Belarusian regime has been trying to stake out a place in mediating the Russia-Ukraine relations. And it is trying to play both sides. On the one hand, it is very interested in trade with Ukraine and through Ukraine with the European Union; on the other hand, it must demonstrate loyalty to Russia. Belarus can stand up against the Ukrainian UN resolution on Crimea, but it is not in any hurry to recognize the Russian occupation of the Crimea, at least at the official level.
Belarusian regime also cannot recognize the military presence of Russian troops and the open war of Russia against Ukraine in Donbass. Since Donbass is not Ukraine anymore but is not Russia (from the point of view of the uncertain position of Lukashenka) why such a neutral, peace-loving country like Belarus cannot get involved in Donbass matters?
- Will Putin and Lukashenka be able to lower the level of tension between the two countries?
- I generally avoid any forecasts. But the increase in tension and the emergence of a growing number of conflict points are trends in recent years. Therefore, even if there is a certain thaw in the Belarus-Russia relations, it will be not even of a temporary nature but a fake show-off thing. Problems are not getting solved, and the tension is growing and becoming aggravated.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.