"Recalling the processes and events in the life of Belarus in 2016, the first thing to mention would be the smoldering economic crisis, which the Belarusian authorities have no will to address through reforms while the old methods prove ineffective," - said the expert. According to him, given that the Belarusian economy is tied with the political regime, any dramatic economy changes seem unwelcome for the government.
"The second trend is the information war. It comprises such issues as the confrontation of the "Russian world" in the struggle for identity, consciousness of citizens, loyalty to the Belarusian state, etc.", - continues Andrei Yahorau.
At the same time, the analyst believes it is impossible to claim that Russia deploys a systematic information war against Belarus right now.
"The volume of Russian financial aid to the pro-Russian NGOs and funds was about $ 2 million in 2014, I think, these figures were even bigger in 2015-2016. This information comes from public sources and we can only make guesses as to how much money was implemented de facto. Russia has approximately the same scenario for attacking the entire post-Soviet space. These are large-scale actions, which are under way in Belarus as well. But I would not say that it is a massive, thought-through strategic attack on Belarus, it is part of the ideological pressure of Russia. And there is no way to escape this pressure in 2017, "- emphasizes the analyst.
The strengthening of the information attacks on the New Years’ eve is due to the traditional aggravation of economic relations between Russia and Belarus:
"But we have seen such conflicts many times. The question is, if Russia is ready to use its full power this time. However, it seems to me, the Kremlin is once again doomed to be defeated because the Russian leadership has no clear guidance as to what to do about Minsk. Should they deprive Belarus of independence? Not really an option. Replace the leader? This is very dangerous, because it causes an unpredictable struggle of the elite ", - said Andrei Yahorau.
"The system showed that it can improve itself, hence last forever. It is flexible, smart and adaptive, it is able to solve different problems, able to simulate competition, publicity, openness etc.", - the analyst explains.
Andrei Yahorau is convinced, "As it has become clear over the last two years, Alexander Lukashenka is not the last dictator in Europe but the first one, Putin and all the rest follow him":
"Lukashenka is a very popular politician in the former Soviet Union states, many people in the Baltic countries and in Poland sympathize him. The opposition we have is standard, formulaic, has no influence, it is uncreative, dependent on external financing resources and closely followed by the intelligence agencies, - says the analyst. - The experts considered a pessimistic scenario back in 2006, we wrote that it was the last year for social action to change the situation. This regime is coming to stay: it will be 20, 30 years, until something can be changed. I want to stress that Belarus is a completely new historical and cultural situation, we are the first modern authoritarianism in Europe. Therefore, there is no way to tell how the situation will be developing at all."
According to Andrei Yahorau all of the trends mentioned above will continue in 2017.
Regarding the relations with Europe, the analyst believes it looks simple: "As usual. Perhaps the government will sign a visa facilitation and readmission agreements, trade documents. But it will be slow and without any radical steps ", - convinced us Andrei Yahorau.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.