But Lukashenka is afraid for his fate and position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
The next round of negotiations between Minsk and Moscow failed: the oil and gas problem was not solved, and the amount of gas debt grew to 550 million dollars.
The political contacts between the leaders of Russia and Belarus deteriorate against the background of economic conflicts. Experts fear that the Kremlin can use the military exercise "West-2017", which will be held in Belarus this summer, to enter our country and annex Belarus under the cover of military exercises.
Are the prospects of Belarusian-Russian relations so gloomy and tragic? Uladzimir Matskevich, philosopher and methodologist, answered the questions of "EuroBelarus" Information Service.
- There has been an oil and gas war between Moscow and Minsk for a year already. The parties hold talks periodically but nothing has actually moved from a dead point. Why?
- If oil and gas market were regulated by the economic laws exclusively, the parties would have reached an agreement long ago.
Belarus and Russia cannot come to terms because the market of strategic energy is associated with the market of strategic arms, border security, providing strategic territory - the military-political aspect interferes here.
- But the political relations have entered the stage of "middling well" as well...
- Russia still perceives Belarus as a satellite, it wants to feel as a full-fledged owner in our territory, and the Belarusian regime actively resists this idea. Whereas previously the Belarus was busy bargaining for the economic benefits only, it is now a much sharper and broader question - sovereignty, territorial integrity, independence from Russia.
- Experts create various scenarios - from bringing the Russian troops into Belarus and a possible annexation to the gradual withering of political relations.
- There is a risk associated with the military exercise “West-2017”. Either two full experienced divisions of Russian troops or units that can leave equipped bases for troops will enter Belarus.
But this danger exists, and it is recognized by the Lukashenka himself. Such a threat disturbs the governments of Ukraine, Poland and other countries neighboring with Belarus.
- The introduction of Russian troops to Belarus is also considered as a preparation for overthrowing Lukashenka.
- There are no reasons to think so: the annexation of Belarus or taking a military-strategic control of our country (if Russia ever had such plans) does not imply getting rid of Lukashenka.
Russia has no alternative to Lukashenka as a politician; any other politician would be less predictable and less controlled by Russia. Alexander Lukashenka is afraid for his position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
One of the recent loud unofficial statements made by Lukashenka state that the Belarusians has not dropped a shed of blood for independence, but the threat is there. These words characterise his fear of the aspirations of the Kremlin.
- Opponents believe that Moscow has plenty of other, non-military means to completely subjugate theBelarusian regime.
- The economic levers of pressure are not enough. Let us not forget that the Russian Federation itself is under Western sanctions, the Russian economy is not in the best condition, and all that Russia can offer to the foreign markets is energy and raw materials. Therefore, if we consider the oil and gas as the joker of Russia, it can be beaten if they are not backed up by military force or at least military threats.
- Can military pressure be avoided one way or another?
- I would not hurry with a definite answer to this question.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.