Tuesday 3 October 2023 | 11:37

The fate of the Belarusan National Platform will be decided in June

07.05.2015  |  Society   |  Aliaksei Jurych,  EuroBelarus
The fate of the Belarusan National Platform will be decided in June

Uladzimir Matskevich suggested dissolving the National Platform and freeing it of the organizations that cannot be constructive in their work so that to build new union from nothing and on new basis.

On May 5 Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum held a round table “Eastern Partnership on the eve of the Summit in Riga: Challenges and tasks for the Belarusan civil society”. However, the discussion unfolded not around the Summit but more around the future of the Platform itself.

A six-year journey

Ulad Vialichka, the head of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, summed up the six-year existence of the Eastern Partnership and Belarusan National Platform. The picture came to be not very positive: there were both successes and failures.

Over the six years of its existence Eastern Partnership has been articulating European perspective for the citizens of six countries: Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Belarus, Azerbaijan, and Armenia. Frames and infrastructures of direct communication and negotiation basis of the EU and EaP were established. A number of countries-members of the EaP are organizing reforms and sign frame agreements. New mechanisms of supra-national participation and action/counteraction to the national community appear.

Now EaP has entered a phase of radicalization of geopolitical situation in the region.

For Belarus a six-year presence of the EaP came to be lost and unfulfilled opportunities of country’s reformation, opportunities to appeal to the European dialog of development in dialog with the society, new formats of professional and sectorial dialog. The main loss is disappointment and tiredness of expectation and lack of real results and changes.

On the eve of the Eastern Partnership Summit in Riga and on the eve of the presidential campaign Belarusan National Platform came to be at the crossroads: complete lack of inner political progress, lack of any communications between the Belarusan regime and civil society.

Six countries-members of the EaP are divided at outsiders and leaders; EU’s neighborhood policy will be reviewed.

Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum didn’t manage to unfold the social and political dialog. Contacts of the civil society organizations with the power structures are reduced to the minimum. There is no general action strategy of pro-democratic forces in today’s Belarus. In situation of economic and political crisis National Platform is not an active agent and doesn’t suggest any way-outs. The work of the Belarusan National Platform in the form of Road Maps was suspended; there is almost no activity within the frames of thematic working groups. National Platform is still not very visible at the common national “screen” of events and agents.

The prospects of work of the Belarusan National Platform are also sad: “a lot of draft work without guarantees of result”. “There is no point of attraction and cooperation of pro-European forces in the country. Pro-European forces do not assemble into a system of actions. National Platform should become this center of attraction”, - Ulad Vialichka assumes.

The head of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus” asked himself two questions.

Is the reboot of the EaP possible? As its use will be felt both by Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova – the EaP leaders, as well as by Belarus, Armenia, and Azerbaijan that are EaP outsiders. Or is the situation for outsiders completely hopeless?

Should we invest resources and forces in enhancing the work of the Belarusan National Platform without clear vision of prospects and predictable results?

The need for our own position

Uladzimir Matskevich, the head of the Board of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus “, asked a question about inability to resolve common national issues. Basically, the philosopher and methodologist demanded to give answers to the questions: who is guilty in BNP’s sad state and what should we do?

By 2015 we lost any opportunity to influence the European policy. The only Belarusan agent that was and is talking with Europe is the Belarusan regime. We are like laths is an endless stream. That is why elaboration of our own stance without taking consideration for people and structures is a false signal. Dissatisfaction creates a wrong image and leads to wrong decisions”, Uladzimir Matskevich emphasized.

He demanded that the National Platform elaborates its own position re the presidential campaign: “If the National Platform isn’t formulating its own attitude towards the elections it rejects communication with Europe”, - Uladzimir Matskevich noted.

Uladzimir Matskevich asked the National Platform to dissolve itself, get rid of ballast in the form of “destructive structures”, and build new one at the old place.

It was Uladzimir Matskevich that set the pace of the lively discussion. In result the promise to set a question to a BNP Conference re the presidential election in June was made.

Self-dissolvent, freeze, or preservation of status quo

However strange it may seem, the suggestion of Uladzimir Matskevich didn’t meet rejection among the participants of the round table.

“I agree that there is need to dissolve the National Platform. By losing its development dynamics, its also lost its functions. And today I don’t even see the resource at the expense of which we could restore the functions that the National Platform lost”, - emphasized Piotr Kuzniatsou, the founder of the “Centre for Regional Development “Homel Democratic Forum”.

Andrei Yahorau, co-chair of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, national coordinator of the EaP CSF for Belarus, the Director of the Center for European Transformation, reminded the audience that at the previous conference of the National Platform he suggested to freeze the work of the BNP to leave it exclusively as an infrastructure element of the Eastern Partnership. However, the conference didn’t make such decision.

Well, the round table didn’t make any decisions either, since it had no corresponding powers.

Results

After the event finished Andrei Yahorau summed up the discussion in the interview with the “EuroBelarus” Information Service:

- We discussed the current problems of the National Platform related to two aspects.

In June we will hold the conference of the National Platform in relation to which we got a need to discuss the expediency of the work of the National Platform in its current form. This question was put on edge by Uladzimir Matskevich, who was seriously talking about the need to determine its position with the presidential campaign. Besides, if we are going to resolve serious tasks in Belarus we need to dissolve the National Platform and clear it of those organizations that cannot be constructive in their work so that to build new union from nothing and on new basis.

Such organization of the question caused serious discussion: some participants were for the National Platform’s dissolution; others were for its preservation in the current form. We haven’t made any decisions yet, but the problem needs to be resolved in June at the conference.

Second question is the Eastern Partnership Summit in Riga and the civil society conference on the eve of the Summit and the stance of the National Platform re the development of the Eastern Partnership and Belarus-Europe cooperation. Eastern Partnership is undergoing crisis now, but in the situation that is emerging now we cannot ignore such countries as Belarus, we cannot abandon Europeanization of these countries because of governments’ policies, as the government and the society are different agents. We need to build the policy in such a way to draw these countries in the European transformation process.

Other news section «Society»

What actually the State List of Historical and Cultural Values gives to Belarusan Heritage Sites?
What actually the State List of Historical and Cultural Values gives to Belarusan Heritage Sites?
The Belarus Committee of ICOMOS announces the collection of cases on the effectiveness of the State List of Historical and Cultural Values as a tool of the safeguarding the cultural monuments.
The right to heritage according to the standards of the Faro Convention: is it possible in Belarus?
The right to heritage according to the standards of the Faro Convention: is it possible in Belarus?
On March 27-28, the Belarus ICOMOS and the EuroBelarus held an online expert workshop on expanding opportunities for community participation in the governance of historical and cultural heritage.
“It is our big joint work”
“It is our big joint work”
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.
The “Agenda 50” campaign was finalised by the Regional Development Forum
The “Agenda 50” campaign was finalised by the Regional Development Forum
The Forum was devoted not so much to the outputs as to the challenges and prospects after the creation and signing of local agendas.
Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool
Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool
To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.
“If a person cannot leave the apartment, he or she does not need an accessible Opera House”
“If a person cannot leave the apartment, he or she does not need an accessible Opera House”
In Stoubcy, they talked about universal design and conducted pilot monitoring of two urban sites accessibility.
Local agenda in Valożyn: mission accomplished
Local agenda in Valożyn: mission accomplished
"Specificity is different, but the priority is general." In Valożyn, a local strategy for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
How Ščučyn was proceeding towards the solution of problems of people with disabilities
How Ščučyn was proceeding towards the solution of problems of people with disabilities
The campaign "Agenda 50" was summed up in Ščučyn, and a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed there.
A program to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities was designed in Stolin
A program to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities was designed in Stolin
The regional center has become the second city in Belarus where the local plan for the implementation of the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
“Agenda 50” in Belarus: from strategies to implementation
“Agenda 50” in Belarus: from strategies to implementation
Representatives of the campaign “Agenda 50” from five pilot cities discussed achievements in creating local agendas for implementing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
In Stoubcy, a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention was signed
In Stoubcy, a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention was signed
It is noteworthy that out of the five pilot cities, Stoubcy was the last to join the campaign “Agenda 50”, but the first one to complete the preparation of the local agenda.
The monitoring of accessibility was presented in Stolin
The monitoring of accessibility was presented in Stolin
On May 28, the city hosted a presentation of the results of the project "Equal to Equal" which was dedicated to monitoring the barrier-free environment in the city.
“They think if the legs don’t function, neither functions the head.”
“They think if the legs don’t function, neither functions the head.”
In Babruysk, wheelchair users are fighting discrimination.
The real work of the Convention depends on all interested communities and organizations
The real work of the Convention depends on all interested communities and organizations
What results has the campaign "Agenda 50" given, what helps to implement the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the regions?
The Convention is a fight against fears, barriers and stigmata
The Convention is a fight against fears, barriers and stigmata
Experts in Valožyn have determined that the quality of people’s life depends on their awareness.
The Convention should become a "living tool”, rather than remaining just an ordinary document
The Convention should become a "living tool”, rather than remaining just an ordinary document
On March 3, members of the campaign "Agenda 50" from different Belarusian cities met in Minsk. The campaign is aimed at the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The main thing is one’s personal motivation for full active life (PHOTOS)
The main thing is one’s personal motivation for full active life (PHOTOS)
There are being implemented three projects under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities campaign in the city of Babruysk.
One man does not make a team, but united we are able to do a lot
One man does not make a team, but united we are able to do a lot
In Ščučyn, people with disabilities learned to be leaders and to advocate their interests.
Barrier-free environment – it is not a ramp, but a means of independence (PHOTOS)
Barrier-free environment – it is not a ramp, but a means of independence (PHOTOS)
In Stolin, social organizations and local authorities are implementing a project aimed at independent living of persons with disabilities, and creating local agenda for the district.
Polish experts: We say “equality” and you say “inclusion”
Polish experts: We say “equality” and you say “inclusion”
Will creation of local agendas be an effective tool in ensuring rights of persons with disabilities in Belarus, just as it was in Poland?
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.