What should we do if people behave like machines, how not to turn into animals with an absolute income and why Belarus is a primitive megamachine.
Within the frames of the Week of Belarusian Thinkingthe Flying University and the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" organized a series of public lectures "Imagining Belarus: Ideas and images for common future". A philosopher and methodologist Uladzimir Matskevich presented another public lecture in Minsk called "People, machines, and animals: friendship and temptation".
He started the presentation with the phrase that has already become a pithy saying in social networks: "My world will never be the same again." Such thing happens after strong impressions, meetings, and lectures... We do not expect this "change of the world" on purpose and cannot prepare ourselves for it.
"But can the humanity get ready and what should happen for us to announce that the world will never be the same again?" - asks Matskevich, speaking about anthropological perspectives of our future.
Let’s take the emergence of artificial intelligence. The dream to create computing capable of accomplishing tasks that the human mind can’t has appeared as early as in the Middle Ages. Anyway, eventually we will have to engage with not only people but also with machines, which can have "their own world". Therefore, many are not ready to accept it, and sign petitions demanding to end the research in the field of artificial intelligence. But, according to Uladzimir Matskevich, it won’t help, as in the struggle people vs. machines the latter will always win. Therefore, we must learn how to build relations with them.
The late 40s witnessed the emergence of the program Eliza, which simulates psychotherapeutic speech.
In 1930 Lewis Mumford described the so-called "megamachines" that are made of people. Their peculiarity is that they don’t work without people.
Later, institutions and states started to be perceived as megamachines.
All technological trends tend to maximize automation and eliminate humans from the process of machine management.
"A person would not need to have a private car when they would just call one with an Internet connection. […]. Considering the state as a megamachine, we understand that someone had to design it, operate it, assign tasks, etc. A car or an airplane without a driver differs from a car or airplane with a driver in the fact that an automatized car doesn’t know where to go", - Uladzimir Matskevich says.
What if there is no state leader, parliament, or ideologist that commands where to go? Will a megamachine stop? No. Even though people created states, the latter can exist without people.
"We can compare the Belarusian state and the US as two megamachines with and without a driver. Does it matter at all who wins the US elections? The American car will go where it should, with any president. In Belarus, we think that if we replace the president everything will be different. In fact, it won’t. Belarusian megamachine can stop, as it is primitive, and it doesn’t move without Lukashenka. But if we improve it, probably change it into a parliamentary republic, the state will be able run without a driver", - the speaker argued.
But if it is true, a machine may acquire the qualities of a person. And then the car would know where you should go better than you. In that case, you won’t have to express your will and your world will never be the same again. According to Uladzimir Matskevich, this is already happening.
"I see the behavior of the machine among the majority of the “inhabitants” of social networks", - the speaker said.
We go to work not because we want to, but because – what else can we do, right? We utter something; but these words are such banalities that have been told long ago.
"Whether we like it or not, we have to be friends with the machines. We are already in a very complex relationship with them; we co-exist, but we cannot be friends, "- Uladzimir Matskevich says.
Smart cities will program and algorithmize our lives. According to Uladzimir Matskevich, once you realize this and start to seek a way out, it can be found in the... animal existence of humanity. And this is where the temptation lies.
"What is absolute income? It is taking people for maintenance as home pets. They are not required to work, accomplish tasks or use creativity. All the basic needs are satisfied,"- said the philosopher and methodologist.
According to Matskevich, there are several alternative ways: to seek self-determination worldwide; get the intellect back and cultivate it; abandon intellect and live in a "ghetto" with absolute income; to fight for your interests and engage in politics.
Consequently, the humanity can be divided into three groups: those who had long been aware of the problem and started to seek self-determination; those who cannot find themselves in a world that has changed, and those who are happy to have their basic needs covered.
People from the first group are not attached to the place of residence, occupation, etc. People of the second group can’t get hold of it, as there’s always something that interferes. As for the third group, they are satisfied with what they have.
In Belarus, there are people of all the three groups, and they don’t understand each other, don’t enter into any kind of relationship, and even if they do, they communicate through megamachines. But only people of the second group need such values as a nation, language, independence, democracy, freedom, etc. However, without the knowledge and skills of people from the first group the problems of the second one cannot be solved.
As a way-out, Uladzimir Matskevich suggests learning how to build relations between humans and machines, as well as establishing a dialogue between the people of the first and second groups.
The Belarus Committee of ICOMOS announces the collection of cases on the effectiveness of the State List of Historical and Cultural Values as a tool of the safeguarding the cultural monuments.
On March 27-28, the Belarus ICOMOS and the EuroBelarus held an online expert workshop on expanding opportunities for community participation in the governance of historical and cultural heritage.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.
"Specificity is different, but the priority is general." In Valożyn, a local strategy for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
The campaign "Agenda 50" was summed up in Ščučyn, and a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed there.
The regional center has become the second city in Belarus where the local plan for the implementation of the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
Representatives of the campaign “Agenda 50” from five pilot cities discussed achievements in creating local agendas for implementing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
It is noteworthy that out of the five pilot cities, Stoubcy was the last to join the campaign “Agenda 50”, but the first one to complete the preparation of the local agenda.
On May 28, the city hosted a presentation of the results of the project "Equal to Equal" which was dedicated to monitoring the barrier-free environment in the city.
On March 3, members of the campaign "Agenda 50" from different Belarusian cities met in Minsk. The campaign is aimed at the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
In Stolin, social organizations and local authorities are implementing a project aimed at independent living of persons with disabilities, and creating local agenda for the district.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.