Tuesday 25 July 2017 | 11:52

Heritage is a verb. The results of the CHOICE project were summarized in Minsk (Photos and video)

10.05.2017  |  Society   |  Yauheniya Burshtyn, EuroBelarus Information Service,  
Heritage is a verb. The results of the CHOICE project were summarized in Minsk (Photos and video)

Does Belarus need a “Public Ministry of Culture” and “Ašmiany Charter” to deal with the historical and cultural sites?

Minsk hosted a panel discussion on the topic: “Cultural heritage and modernity: is there formation of a new subjectivity?” The presentation of the historical and cultural heritage studies, which were made within the framework of the project CHOICE: Cultural Heritage — Opportunity for Civic Engagement for the last two years became the occasion for the dispute. Particular attention was paid to the possibility of forming a new civil subjectivity to address common professional issues of heritage protection and interpretation. EuroBelarus Information Service livestreamed the discussion.

Tatiana Poshevalava, CHOICE Coordinator recalled that with the assistance of the EU, CHOICE program was developed for four countries: Ukraine, Belarus, Armenia and Moldova. The expert covered the purposes and forms of work within the project, including supporting non-governmental cultural organizations and professional communities in the implementation of innovative projects for the relevant cultural heritage protection and interpretation.

Tatiana Poshevalava

Andrei Yahorau, political scientist, director of the Center for European Transformation summed up the situation with the preservation of cultural heritage in his report and made some proposals for civil society regarding the work in this area.

According to Andrei Yahorau, any research in the field of culture in Belarus suffers a lack of statistical data, there is no special analytics.

If we consider the situation in the context of cultural heritage and economy, the inclusion of heritage in the economic turnover (purchase and sale of sites, creating jobs, heritage as a factor of development of regions and territories as well as tourism) is crucial. However there are two problems. Firstly, there are many rules in this field related to the special attitude to heritage sites. The expert finds it generally beneficial, but at the same time it is holding back investors from investing in these sites. Secondly, revaluation of the importance of tourism is the key as all the economic activities that involve cultural sites are narrowed down to their touristic potential, which significantly limits the possible economic use of cultural heritage.

Aksana Shelest, Andrei Yahorau, Stsiapan Stureika, Uladzimir Matskevich

Cultural heritage always sparks conflicts over possession and use, different values and interests in usage of sites. We often face ethical disputes about what the correct way of reconstruction is; as various communities see particular sites in different use conflicts of social priorities emerge. There are arguments associated with the techniques and methods of work at the sites. Andrei Yahorau believes it happens due to the underdeveloped institute of mediation and conflict resolution in Belarus. Parties cannot agree with each other, which results in the state arbitrating disputes in administrative manner.

In addition to the lack of mechanisms for political dialogue, we are paying little attention to the international historical and cultural policy.

“In particular, it is a mistake for Belarus not to work enough with the legacy of GDL and not to defend its cultural brands that are increasingly being assigned to Lithuania, Ukraine and other countries,” stated the director of CET.

Another peculiarity is weak interaction between various parties in the formulation and implementation of cultural policy in Belarus under the dominance of the expert-oriented approach to solving the issues of cultural heritage. Our law largely sees the cultural policy as a management of a special type of production. At the same time there is no strategy of cultural development of cities and regions. The state frequently draws attention to the jewels of cultural heritage mentioned in the State Register, ignoring the rest of the sites.

Such a situation leads to a reduction in the ​​cultural policy. Andrei Yahorau suggested establishing a “Public Ministry of Culture”. It would primarily be concerned not with an official body but with the way of thinking and the formation of a public administration aspect of the cultural heritage in addition to the state administration aspect. Moreover, any activity should lead to sustainable use in real-world conditions.

The main goal of the “Public Ministry of Culture” would be activities oriented at developing the views of general public at the cultural heritage sites and work with its social and cultural component. Another task is supplement and development of social and cultural heritage documents, including the international ones, such as the charter “On the principles of social and cultural activities in the field of historical and cultural heritage.” Why not create our own “Ašmiany” or “Babrujsk Charter”?..

Uladzimir Matskevich, Ihar Charniauski

Uladzimir Matskevich, philosopher and methodologist has been engaged in what is defined as “Cultural Policy program” for many years. But for him culture is something that must be overcome.

“To go beyond the known into the unknown, from what have been created to the uncreated. I believe the main element of cultural policy is innovation, creativity. Heritage is not only what has remained, but what we have special attitude towards: heritage is what we may take with us to the future, or leave in the past. This is what will make a part of the future,” argued the expert.

On the other hand, the expert continues, heritage is something that belongs to nobody yet something we all claim for our own. This paradox is a source of conflict.

“If we understood that we are subjects, nation, people, we would not have any conflicts. But we do not understand, we create opposition between the society and the state, and each of us from their own position says that heritage belongs to us. We don’t communicate with others; we lack the ability to take someone else's side. These are the reasons for the current state of affairs in our country both with the material side of culture and its spiritual component. It is not about the monuments, but about what we can or cannot do with our minds. Before we start reconstruction of the sites, we must clear our heads.”

Ihar Rakhanski, renovator, the head of the project bureau of the ICOMOS Belarusan committee focused on the suggestion of Andrei Yahorau to create our own “charter”.

“The document, which would primarily express ethical system of attitude to the heritage is worth creating. But the charter, as well as the heritage, is not a noun, it is a verb. By creating a charter, we hope that the charter will create us,” Ihar Rakhanski shared.

Ihar Charniauski, Anton Astapovich, Ihar Rakhanski

But Anton Astapovich, chairman of the Belarusan Voluntary Society for Protection of Monuments of History and Culture questioned the need to create a “Public Ministry of Culture”.

“We can make a lot of structures, but will they work? We need to cooperate more closely with the organizations that are already there. Firstly, the Ministry of Culture will not do anything until local and regional authorities are working properly. We must not wait until we give birth to a charter, public organizations should create specific proposals for changes and additions to the law and technical standards. Local community fails even at the stage of popularization. The fact that the sites are not protected by the state is not the fault of the state only, a great responsibility lies with the society. Any private individual or legal entity has the right to propose giving a site the status of historical and cultural value. No “Public Ministry of Culture” will help until we have leveled the gap between Minsk and regions,” assures Anton Astapovich.

“As for the the society and cultural heritage, what are we paying attention to? This would be wrong renovation, Kurapaty, intangible heritage, both listed and unlisted. How do we distinguish the reality from the chatter on Facebook?” questions the audience Stsiapan Stureika, cultural anthropologist. “I propose to see the heritage as a process. It occurs when some union of people claims for their own something tangible or intangible, and undertakes certain activities. There is no heritage without an owner. Any activity is a constant contestation of ownership, other forms of appropriation. The cultural policy of the state is reduced to administration, ideology, control, but in fact it does not exist — and it is fine.”

Andrei Yahorau, Stsiapan Stureika, Uladzimir Matskevich

Ihar Charniauski, the ex-head of the department for Historical and Cultural Heritage Protection of the Ministry of Culture of Belarus outlined two global issues: funding and the professional level of the participants of heritage protection process. He also highlighted that there is almost no high-quality professional restoration in Belarus, which not only affects the level of preservation of cultural heritage, but also drives away the investors. According to Ihar Charniauski, we have quite enough of non-governmental organizations involved in the protection of heritage sites, but there is no authority that would coordinate their work.

Outside the panel discussion many questions and suggestions remain. The reflection on the results of work within the framework of CHOICE project is in the future, but it is already clear that civil society should be more actively involved in the process of preserving cultural heritage.

EuroBelarus Information Service:

The international project CHOICE — Cultural Heritage: Opportunity for Improving Civic Engagement is implemented by the European Association for Local Democracy ALDA (France) in collaboration with the International Consortium “EuroBelarus” (Lithuania).

The project takes place in Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova and Armenia within the framework of the EU Eastern Partnership program with the information and consulting support of partner organizations:

  • The Center for Cultural Management (Lviv, Ukraine);
  • ICOM National Committee (Chisinau, Moldova);
  • Millennium Foundation for Education and Research (Yerevan, Armenia);
  • Public Association “Center for Social Innovation” (Minsk, Belarus).

The Belarusan part of the project — CHOICE — Belarus: heritage and modernity — is based on the value of cultural heritage as a resource for strengthening and development of the modern Belarusan identity and European civilizational choice of Belarus. Organizers of the project want to enable expansion of a variety of innovative approaches and initiatives to introduce the cultural heritage of Belarus to the contemporary cultural life of the Belarusan society.

Video (in Russian and Belarusan):

____________________________________________________________________________

The International Project "CHOICE - Cultural Heritage: Opportunity for Improving Civic Engagement" is implemented by the Association of Local Democracy Agencies ALDA (France) in conjunction with the International Consortium EuroBelarus (Lithuania).

Other news section «Society»

Sofia Sadovskaya: Parents do not understand why one needs contemporary Belarusan art
Sofia Sadovskaya: Parents do not understand why one needs contemporary Belarusan art
For the last five years, the Children's Creative Workshops (CCW) acquaints children with fine arts in a game form.
Larysa Bycko: Heritage can only be preserved together
Larysa Bycko: Heritage can only be preserved together
Many people came to the premiere of the play "Memory Shelter" to the village of Stuly in the Pruzany Rajon [District].
Zmicier Surski - We should pay tribute to the Belarusan poster
Zmicier Surski - We should pay tribute to the Belarusan poster
In 1991, poster artists from the Soviet Union sent 120 posters to the triennale in Japanese Tayama.
Oksana Gaiko - Our audio guide of Brest is a monument to Holocaust victims
Oksana Gaiko - Our audio guide of Brest is a monument to Holocaust victims
The center of Brest can now be studied with the help of an audio guide called Brest Stories Guide - however, meanwhile, only one of the city pages - anti-Semitism and the Holocaust.
To preserve heritage and to become valuable for each other
To preserve heritage and to become valuable for each other
On June, 16th, in the Minsk-based creative space CECH, the results of the work of the international program "CHOICE - Cultural Heritage - Opportunity for Civic Engagement" were presented.
Belarusan human rights defenders’ view on human rights activity and questions of cooperation
Belarusan human rights defenders’ view on human rights activity and questions of cooperation
We present a research results report of Belarusan human rights organizations sector.
Historical and Cultural Heritage and Its Substance
Historical and Cultural Heritage and Its Substance
Our expert in issues of forming identity on local visual codes, professional designer Michal Aniempadystau prepared a special report for our meeting in Brussels and further at a Belarusian discussion.
Social base of transformation programs in Belarus
Social base of transformation programs in Belarus
The Centre for European Transformation has prepared a sociological research report (abridged version) of social base of transformation programs in Belarus.
Opportunities for launching in Belarus the mechanisms to enjoyment of HR by persons with disabilitie
Opportunities for launching in Belarus the mechanisms to enjoyment of HR by persons with disabilitie
The Centre for European Transformation has prepared a research report of potential and opportunities for launching in Belarus the mechanisms to enjoyment of human rights by persons with disabilities.
Civil society’s role and place in the system of donor assistance to Belarus (2006-2014)
Civil society’s role and place in the system of donor assistance to Belarus (2006-2014)
The Centre for European Transformation has prepared a working paper on civil society’s role and place in the system of external assistance to Belarus in 2006-2014.
Final event of project CHOICE – Paving the way to European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018
Final event of project CHOICE – Paving the way to European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018
The final event of the two-year EU funded project “CHOICE - Cultural Heritage: Opportunity for Improving Civic Engagement” was held on 6 June at the Committee of the Regions, in Brussels.
Heritage is a verb. The results of the CHOICE project were summarized in Minsk (Photos and video)
Heritage is a verb. The results of the CHOICE project were summarized in Minsk (Photos and video)
Does Belarus need a “Public Ministry of Culture” and “Ašmiany Charter” to deal with the historical and cultural sites?
Aliaksei Chubat: "Singing gatherings" do not teach singing, but acquaint with the tradition
Aliaksei Chubat: "Singing gatherings" do not teach singing, but acquaint with the tradition
Organizer of singing workshops within the framework of the “CHOICE-Belarus: Legacy and modernity” project reflects on how one can build a bridge between museum and people.
Aliaksandr Tamkovich:If someone had said we would build a NPP I would have sent them to psychiatrist
Aliaksandr Tamkovich:If someone had said we would build a NPP I would have sent them to psychiatrist
On April 12 a "Chernobyl: Between Past and Future" discussion as well as a presentation of the German translation of the book "Philosophy of kindness. From disaster to garden of hope" took place.
Andrei Kazakevich: The protests will inevitably fade due to the lack of organization
Andrei Kazakevich: The protests will inevitably fade due to the lack of organization
Continuation of street actions requires logistics, planning, and thoughtful information support. The authorities, in turn, do everything possible to prevent organizing the protests.
Gennadz Maksak: Europe must react adequately to the events in Minsk
Gennadz Maksak: Europe must react adequately to the events in Minsk
A new wave of political repressions should make the EU return to tougher policy towards the Belarusian regime.
Nasta Loika: We returned to strict measures towards the dissentient
Nasta Loika: We returned to strict measures towards the dissentient
The Belarusian authorities violate human rights and the state obligations by suppressing  protests, violent arrests and sentences.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Regions can become the main threat for the Belarusian system
Uladzimir Matskevich: Regions can become the main threat for the Belarusian system
There are still no clear instructions from the center while the wave of protest is rolling out from Minsk across the country.
Experts: Cancer is no longer considered a verdict in Belarus
Experts: Cancer is no longer considered a verdict in Belarus
World Cancer Day is celebrated on February 4. What do the Belarusian know about the oncological diseases and what is their attitude towards them?
What is wrong with the academic freedoms and rights of students in Belarus?
What is wrong with the academic freedoms and rights of students in Belarus?
Minsk hosted a conference dedicated to the academic values ​​and the prospects for reforms of higher education in Belarus.
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

Belarusan human rights defenders’ view on human rights activity and questions of cooperation

We present a research results report of Belarusan human rights organizations sector.

Belarus's Lukashenko alleges “fifth column” plot as unrest continues

Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.

Historical and Cultural Heritage and Its Substance

Our expert in issues of forming identity on local visual codes, professional designer Michal Aniempadystau prepared a special report for our meeting in Brussels and further at a Belarusian discussion.