Andrei Yahorau: EU is dragging time, hoping that Russians will stop supporting gunmen in Donbas
24.07.2014 |In the World| Aliaksei Jurych, EuroBelarus,
Defenseless EU resolution not only conceals the direct perpetrators of Boeing-777 catastrophe, but also sharply contrasts with the unambiguous statements made by numerous leaders of European states.
On July 22 EU Foreign Affairs Council in Brussels was discussing the possibility to toughen sanctions against Russia. The destruction of the international airliner Boeing-777 in Donetsk region by the gunmen, supported by Russia, transformed local Ukraine-Russia conflict into an international problem. 298 citizens of the EU and Us died in the catastrophe; and that required clear and unequivocal assessment of the situation in the eastern Ukraine from the EU.
However, the EU isn’t going to toughen sanctions against Russian officials and the politicians in the so-called “Donetsk and Lugansk people’s Republics”, and postponed the final decision until July 24.
How efficient can be the new sanctions introduced by the EU against Russia? EuroBelarus” Information Service talked about it with Andrei Yahorau, the head of the Centre for European Transformation.
- Did the EU finally introduce sanctions against Russia or not? The results of the meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers held on July 22 in Brussels didn’t clarify anything, except for the statement made by Catherine Ashton, saying that Russia has time to fix everything before July 24.
- The issue of sanctions is now only a matter of technicalities: before July 24 EU Commission and European External Action Service should prepare recommendations regarding technical opportunities of realization of targeted sanctions, i.e. draw up the lists of officials and enterprises, which will be included in the final list.
It remains unclear what will become of that. The EU sanctions might become the continuation of the US policy – such measures can be quite efficient, though not dangerous for Russia.
The EU Council is obliged to make decisions regarding the introduction of the economic sanctions. Of course, sanctions take into consideration the position of the countries-members of the EU. For now it is unclear whether the final list will include Russian enterprises, or it will be limited to the targeted sanctions against separate officials.
EU resolution says that there is a possibility to toughen economic sanctions unless Russia fulfills the obligations that it gave earlier before July 24.
And if Russia doesn’t stop supporting the gunmen, if the separatists don’t fulfill the recommendations of the international community and don’t let the experts investigate the Boeign-777 catastrophe, it will serve as a ground to recognize separatist groups as terroristic organizations.
- How efficient will be the new sanctions introduced by the EU against Russia, and are they enough to influence Kremlin’s position?
- I doubt that the European sanctions will be enough tough and adequate to the situation. EU is dragging time, hoping that Russians will stop supporting gunmen in Donbas. From my point of view, situation with the destruction of Boeing-777 put the gunmen at an absolutely different level – de-facto, EU citizens have died. Thus, the reaction of the EU Council doesn’t seem enough tough and adequate; and accordingly, the sanctions won’t be enough tough and adequate, too.
- What is the EU position in regard to the Boeing-777 catastrophe in Donetsk region? On the threshold of the meeting the world leaders and foreign ministers were directly blaming the gunmen and Russia for the attack. Does this line remain in the resolution adopted on July 22?
- No direct culprits of the Boeing-777 tragedy are named in the resolution; the wording of the document is very discreet. EU politicians are indirectly involving Ukrainian authorities in the conflict, as well as are indirectly agreeing with Russia: unless Ukraine had renewed the anti-terror operation this tragedy wouldn’t have happened.
Casuistic rhetoric of the EU resolution sharply contrasts with the unambiguous statements made by numerous leaders of European states, who said that it is Russia and the gunmen who are to blame for the destruction of Boeing-777. It contravenes clear statements made by the Foreign Ministers of Lithuania and Great Britain, who stand for tougher EU sanctions against Russia. We see big difference between the statements made by the world leaders and the defenseless EU resolution.
Within the activities of the EU-funded CHOICE, Ihor Savcha, Centre for Cultural Management, visited Albertyna Buchynska and Roman Tarnavsky, Coordinators of the activities in Boryslav (Ukraine).
Dozens of activists remain in Armenian prisons, the police carries out political orders of the ruling elite, stresses a representative of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum released on bail.
Russia has no opportunities, i.e., no intent to unleash a full-scale war against Ukraine; but the destabilization of the situation in the country remains one of its main goals.
Minsk should not deceive itself with hopes for joint operation the would-be Belarusian nuclear power plant in Astravets, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevičius said on Friday.
The confrontation of several forces in Yerevan is a no-win, and tends to worsen, the head of the Eurasia Partnership Foundation, the publicist Gevorg Ter-Gabrielyan says.
On July 17, an armed group seized the building of the Patrol-Guard Service Regiment in Erebuni district of Yerevan. First National Security Service reported about "an armed group", then – "terrorists"
About two weeks ago, on April 2, intensive clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh happened. Belarus’ reaction to it left Armenia deeply bewildered.
On April 12-13, Lithuanian border guards are holding a tactical exercise on the border with Belarus. The game is aimed at improving the staff skills to detaining illegal migrants.
By participating in all military and economic blocks with Russia, the Belarusian regime is trying to build the image of a neutral country and a peacemaker.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.