Sergey Datsyuk: Savchenko is a Ukrainian Joan of Arc, capable of leading people
27.05.2016 |In the World| Aliaksei Jurych, EuroBelarus
photo EPA
Society attributes the role of a troublemaker to Savchenko, who won’t let the country stay oligarchical and calm.
After two years of being in captivity in Russia Nadzeya Savchenko returned to Ukraine. President Poroshenko presented her with the "Gold Star" Hero of Ukraine; society is caught by euphoria.
But is Savchenko’s return home perceived so univocally?
The “EuroBelarus” Information Service asked Kyiv philosopher Sergey Datsyuk to comment on that.
- The release of Nadzeya Savchenko, who spent two years of being in captivity in Russia, caused a real euphoria in the Ukrainian society. What does her return symbolize?
- Savchenko’s return for the society is the return of the hero.
For politicians it’s the return of a politician: Savchenko has not only been a deputy of the Ukrainian Parliament for a long time, but also a deputy of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
What does Savchenko’s return mean for intellectuals? Savchenko is a very passionate person, who is mostly guided by emotional passion, rather than rational reasoning. Savchenko is a Ukrainian Joan of Arc, capable of leading people. But she can be outplayed and outperformed by politicians, and this is already a problem. Today, she has already made two important statements: if Minsk agreements exist, they must be fulfilled. Savchenko called the return of prisoners of war to be her main goal.
That should be right. However, from the point of view of the end of war the above-mentioned problems don’t form a strategy. The strategy of the war lies in two aspects: the return of sovereignty and assertion of identity. The return of prisoners, funerals of the dead, and social rehabilitation of the wounded are important issues, but not the primary ones. For one simple reason: if sovereignty and identity aren’t fought back, we’ll face a constant war; new prisoners will appear, whom we’ll have to return all the time.
Savchenko’s speeches are the speeches of the highly passionate personality, but not the speeches of a politician, who has been thinking of what should be done for the sake of the war. This immediately raises suspicion.
- Which hopes does the Ukrainian society that seems to be tired of the current government connect with Savchenko’s return?
- On the eve of Savchenko’s return we received a lot of signals that the ruling class aims at stability, peace, and development, whereas society attributes the role of a troublemaker to Savchenko, who won’t let the country stay oligarchical and calm. Society needs turbulence, second wind, or withdrawal from a counter-revolutionary situation and transition to the second stage of the revolution.
- Is Savchenko’s release and possible release of other prisoners some turning point in the war, or it is a routine of every war?
- It was already in 1943 that the Nazis realized that the war was lost, but they were still resisting for one and a half years. It will still take long from the turning point to the victory. Yes, Savchenko’s release will, probably, be called the turning point of the war one day, which only says that we are on the right track.
- Peace is possible only through war, said Savchenko in Boryspil airport. Whose opinion has she rebroadcast – her own, the one of the political elite or the one of the society?
- Savchenko has expressed conflicting opinions. "Peace is possible only through war" speaks her mind and mood brought from detention. In Ukraine, she has already been explained: there are Minsk agreements that are to be carried out. To which she replied: if Minsk agreements exist, then they should be fulfilled. That is contradictory. Political game has already started. It’s impossible to be that ambiguous in politics; one must firmly choose peace, war or conciliation.
- Thus, the political elite wants to preserve Nadzeya Savchenko’s symbolic status, doesn’t it?
- This is what happens to all the people who win public attention. But Nadzeya Savchenko is not the kind of person who can be easily manipulated. Over time she will understand the intricacies of the political game, and will no longer slip up.
Within the activities of the EU-funded CHOICE, Ihor Savcha, Centre for Cultural Management, visited Albertyna Buchynska and Roman Tarnavsky, Coordinators of the activities in Boryslav (Ukraine).
Dozens of activists remain in Armenian prisons, the police carries out political orders of the ruling elite, stresses a representative of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum released on bail.
Russia has no opportunities, i.e., no intent to unleash a full-scale war against Ukraine; but the destabilization of the situation in the country remains one of its main goals.
Minsk should not deceive itself with hopes for joint operation the would-be Belarusian nuclear power plant in Astravets, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevičius said on Friday.
The confrontation of several forces in Yerevan is a no-win, and tends to worsen, the head of the Eurasia Partnership Foundation, the publicist Gevorg Ter-Gabrielyan says.
On July 17, an armed group seized the building of the Patrol-Guard Service Regiment in Erebuni district of Yerevan. First National Security Service reported about "an armed group", then – "terrorists"
About two weeks ago, on April 2, intensive clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh happened. Belarus’ reaction to it left Armenia deeply bewildered.
On April 12-13, Lithuanian border guards are holding a tactical exercise on the border with Belarus. The game is aimed at improving the staff skills to detaining illegal migrants.
By participating in all military and economic blocks with Russia, the Belarusian regime is trying to build the image of a neutral country and a peacemaker.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.