Uladzimir Matskevich: Trump has a sword of Damocles hanging above his head
12.01.2017 |In the World| Aliaksei Jurych, EuroBelarus
The hacking scandal is directed against Trump and sows doubts in the legitimacy of his victory.
According to the BBC Russian Service, the US intelligence report says Vladimir Putin tried to help Donald Trump win the presidential election.
"EuroBelarus" Information Service together with Uladzimir Matskevich, philosopher and methodologist, tried to clear up the causes and the consequences of the scandal:
- Hackers have been making attempts to influence the United States elections since summer. The first of the hackers confessed to illegal activities in June 2016 and pretended to be Romanian.
Next major incident happened right before the presidential elections, when it seemed that Clinton has an impressive advantage over Trump.
John Brennan, director of the CIA, was the first to bring up the topic of hackers attacks. The Secretary of State John Kerry officially confirmed the information.
Despite the fact that the press majorly has only indirect information, the scandal has been developing for six months, and it hasn’t quieted down after the elections. Moreover, the US made a fairly sharp diplomatic move: 35 Russian diplomats were expelled from the USA.
- What could this scandal mean?
- It is impossible to draw final conclusions about the impact of the attacks on the US election campaign prior to the publication of the full report of the CIA, which is expected not later than January 20 - the last day of the Obama’s presidency.
On the one hand, the scandal can be attributed to the party struggles between the Republicans and the Democrats.
On the other hand, there is a struggle between the Russian and American intelligence agencies that always watch one another, use legal and illegal methods to monitor the potential enemy.
Such a strong reaction of the Obama administration is unusual, in particular, the expulsion of the diplomats. This may indicate that America takes serious interest in the information war.
- What can be the consequences of the hacking scandal?
- It depends on whether the US intelligence agencies are able to prove the responsibility of Russia in the hacking attacks and the level of involvement of the Kremlin and Putin in particular. If the Americans prove the fact of the Russian intelligence agencies intervention in the internal affairs of the United States, the events can go one way, and if all the information remains unclear, then it would indicate some kind of diplomatic war.
It is quite difficult to assume how the Trump administration will handle all of this, because the campaign is directed against Trump and sows doubts in the legitimacy of his victory.
After the Trump’s inauguration, his administration will treat the information much more carefully, it might even be classified.
- Is it true that the hacking scandal should not be limited to the U.S.-Russia relations only?
- Of course! The scandal affects the internal political system of the United States itself. Trump made numerous populist and rather dubious claims during his election campaign, which cannot but alarm the political establishment of the US. Naturally, there is a hypothetical possibility of impeachment of Trump.
Trump has a sword of Damocles hanging above his head: if the CIA has very strong evidence that Putin's actions or the actions of GRU aimed not only to undermine the US election, but to directly support Trump as well, this scandal could be brought to light at a time when Trump’s policy significantly differs from the policy of the US ruling elite.
- Can this scandal be used to create a global anti-Kremlin coalition as well?
- It would be good if the world leaders and international institutions took the activities of the Russian intelligence agencies in the information war seriously and made a move to prevent such acts in the future.
Although the activities of "WikiLeaks" are not entirely legitimate, it allows public opinion to control governments and prevent those with bad intentions from manipulating the public consciousness. Not only does the new technology offer incredible opportunities for progress, but it also reveals new risks and dangers, which we are not yet fully able to comprehend.
Within the activities of the EU-funded CHOICE, Ihor Savcha, Centre for Cultural Management, visited Albertyna Buchynska and Roman Tarnavsky, Coordinators of the activities in Boryslav (Ukraine).
Dozens of activists remain in Armenian prisons, the police carries out political orders of the ruling elite, stresses a representative of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum released on bail.
Russia has no opportunities, i.e., no intent to unleash a full-scale war against Ukraine; but the destabilization of the situation in the country remains one of its main goals.
Minsk should not deceive itself with hopes for joint operation the would-be Belarusian nuclear power plant in Astravets, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevičius said on Friday.
The confrontation of several forces in Yerevan is a no-win, and tends to worsen, the head of the Eurasia Partnership Foundation, the publicist Gevorg Ter-Gabrielyan says.
On July 17, an armed group seized the building of the Patrol-Guard Service Regiment in Erebuni district of Yerevan. First National Security Service reported about "an armed group", then – "terrorists"
About two weeks ago, on April 2, intensive clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh happened. Belarus’ reaction to it left Armenia deeply bewildered.
On April 12-13, Lithuanian border guards are holding a tactical exercise on the border with Belarus. The game is aimed at improving the staff skills to detaining illegal migrants.
By participating in all military and economic blocks with Russia, the Belarusian regime is trying to build the image of a neutral country and a peacemaker.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.