The economist doesn’t see any “factors that will lead to the sudden breakthrough into the EU market”.
Aliaksandr Lukashenka is worried about overstocked Belarusan warehouses and demanded to unload them by autumn, through European market, too. Whether the breakthrough or at least positive dynamics towards Europe is possible, EuroBelarus Information Service asked Barys Zhaliba, professor and the head of the finance and loans chair in Minsk Management Institute.
- It is such Belarusan goods as oil products and potash fertilizers that are in demand with the EU, i.e. basically such raw products that don’t need substantial processing. All the rest is not so important; so talks about sudden decision of the EU to buy something else is nothing but propaganda. I see no factors that will lead to the sudden breakthrough into the EU market. The quality of Belarusan products can’t compete with the European quality, and neither can the price.
- So it means that Lukashenka gives empty promises, doesn’t he?
- Aliaksandr Lukashenka started exploiting administrative resources to the full and holding numerous conferences. Well, this can work and rescue Belarusan economy to some extent. But since 2009, when Russian market came to our rescue by taking up Belarusan goods, new factors have appeared. Thus, Russian market is in stagnation, and after its entrance into the World Trade organization, Russian products compete with imported goods.
- So it is only Moscow direction that we still have?
- Yes, Russian vector still determinates Belarusan export, though recently Belarusan administrative resource turned into the direction of the Third World countries. Belarus may have some positive effect from it, as our authorities hope; however, orientation at Russia will still be the leading one.
The Belarusian government has invited the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to prepare five large state-owned companies for privatization.
Officially, the unemployment in our country is reducing – if judging by the number of registrations at the labor exchange; however, the number of jobs doesn’t increase in the economy.
Recently Belarus State Military Industrial Committee announced that in the first half of 2016 its enterprises earned a net profit of $80m, thus over-fulfilling the assigned export plans by a quarter.
Poor economic conditions in the countryside, restrictions, unfair competition, inefficiency of state-owned agricultural enterprises also contribute to this ‘success story’, writes Aliaksandr Filipau.
On 20 June Lukashenka met with vice-chair and president of the Chinese CITIC Group Corporation Wang Jiong; it seems especially important in light of Lukashenka’s planned visit to China in September.
All the conditions for everyone to be able to earn a decent salary have been enabled in Belarus, however, it is necessary to make some effort to get the money, assumes the president.
Belarus is losing currency earnings – in the 6 months of 2016 the country earned 3 billion less than in the same period in 2015. Instead of removing the causes of the flop the state relies on magic.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.