“No local project of such kind turned to be successful in Belarus yet. You can’t build happy market economy in such a controlled country”.
EuroBelarus Information Service has already reported about the complaints of the Belarusan ecologists concerning the legality of the public expertise of the Chinese-Belarusian Industrial Park project. Siarhei Balykin, the economist, gives his assessment of the economic reasonability of this much-talked-of project.
- I have a feeling that the authors of all standard acts devoted to the project wanted to allot it with every possible facilities, as the whole number of preferences is unprecedented. Thus, during the first decade after the registration the residents of the park are exempted from income tax, real estate tax, land and municipal taxes. Next decade the taxes will remain and park residents are to pay only half the sum of the above mentioned taxes. The residents of the park are also exempted from the obligatory sale of currency earnings. However, I think that such programs as free economic zones and industrial parks are doomed to failure in Belarus.
- What about the widely-advertised success of the High Technologies Park?
- Silicon Valley has been involved and keeps being involved in production, whereas High Technologies Park is the community of contracting agencies and outsourcing companies which perform not very intellectual work. The goals are set abroad; final product is determined by the western customers as well, while our specialists perform the function of well-paid qualified IT-workers that always meet the deadline. I.e. this project has only legalized Belarusan programming specialists that worked on western companies before. Belarusan science and Belarusan technologies almost don’t benefit from that.
- Your point is clear. What about its Chinese project?
- I want to highlight once more that none of such projects has acquired the characteristics the government wanted to see in them. They have become local points where some quite successful enterprises are working, but it doesn’t resolve the problem. I think that the Chinese-Belarusian Industrial Park is the same project with highly set goals. No hard-working Chinese with money will save Belarusan economy. Local facilities will give local effect; but if one wants to change the situation in the country Belarus should become one large innovation technical park. We have smart people, qualified working force and some traditions, too. But in order to rescue the situation reforms that will provide equal free conditions for management are required.
- Well, will the country finally benefit from it besides possible ecological problems?
- The state will get some money for its budget, but there will be no transfer of technologies and nothing innovative in that. I don’t believe that the Chinese will bring super modern technologies to Belarus. So, roughly speaking, we’ll get not only the European “second-hand” model of technological thought, but a Chinese one, that we, Belarusans, will have to use till it is worn out. But we can’t build happy market economy throughout the whole country in such a situation, when everything is under control.
The Belarusian government has invited the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to prepare five large state-owned companies for privatization.
Officially, the unemployment in our country is reducing – if judging by the number of registrations at the labor exchange; however, the number of jobs doesn’t increase in the economy.
Recently Belarus State Military Industrial Committee announced that in the first half of 2016 its enterprises earned a net profit of $80m, thus over-fulfilling the assigned export plans by a quarter.
Poor economic conditions in the countryside, restrictions, unfair competition, inefficiency of state-owned agricultural enterprises also contribute to this ‘success story’, writes Aliaksandr Filipau.
On 20 June Lukashenka met with vice-chair and president of the Chinese CITIC Group Corporation Wang Jiong; it seems especially important in light of Lukashenka’s planned visit to China in September.
All the conditions for everyone to be able to earn a decent salary have been enabled in Belarus, however, it is necessary to make some effort to get the money, assumes the president.
Belarus is losing currency earnings – in the 6 months of 2016 the country earned 3 billion less than in the same period in 2015. Instead of removing the causes of the flop the state relies on magic.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.