Round-table “Belarus on its way towards European area of higher education”, where Belarusan experts learned how to switch to Bologna system from their neighbours, took place on January 28 in Minsk.
Despite the fact that Belarus is not part of the European Area of Higher Education, calling the country a new-comer in this process would be unfair. In 2009-2011, Belarus was actively preparing a membership application for International Bologna Secretariat and these efforts caused a lot of discussion nationally and internationally. Currently, the process of transition to Bologna system slowed done however has not been interrupted. This small break gives Belarus time to reflect and learn from its neighbours' experience.
"Forewarned is forearmed" - This saying became a slogan for the round-table 'Belarus on Its Way towards European Area of Higher Education' that took place on January 28 in Minsk. The meeting gathered teachers from different universities of Belarus, National Institute for Higher Education, Centre for Students' Initiative, and Independent Public Bologna Committee. Professor Rimantas Zelvys, Vice-Rector for Research of Vilnius Pedagogical University (Lithuania) was an invited speaker at the event. During the first panel he spoke about Lithuania's joining the Bologna process, the challenges that the university had to face and the ways to address them. Mr Zelvys identified four types of countries regarding their involvement in Bologna process:
• Western-European states that have stronger tradition of university's autonomy. These countries were the initiators of Bologna process and form its main principles;
• Central- and Eastern-European countries that ones were part of socialist camp, but became the EU members and belong to the European Area of Higher Education. Their peculiarity is that they had to quickly conduct a number of radical and sometimes even painful reforms;
• Eastern-European states that are not EU members but belong to the European Area of Higher Education. In their case the transition took place with no pressure and changes were mostly of cosmetic nature;
• And finally, the countries that are not EU members and did not join the Bologna process, including Belarus.
In his speech, Mr Zelvys paid special attention to the difficulties Lithuanian universities faced during the transition period. The main elements of Bologna system being three-stage training (baccalaureate, magistracy, and doctorate) and application of credits to estimate knowledge and skills, differ dramatically from that in the post-Soviet countries. He believes that misinterpretation of these elements create the major obstacle for joining the Bologna process.
Another important change that the universities of Lithuania had to go through was universities' autonomy. The Bologna principles suppose the minimum influence of state to higher education. The decision-making power goes to the Senate as in internal body and to the Board of Trustees as an external, while the government can accredit colleges and universities, monitor teachers' qualification and control financial management.
Mr Zelvys believes in the Bologna future for Belarus. "In my opinion, the European system is the future of higher education. My country has already started the process, and despite all the difficulties, I cannot imagine that we would return to the old system. It seems to me Belarus could quite fit into the Bologna process as well. Believe me, even the changes that may seem a pure formality in the beginning later will start bringing results”, he said.
The Minsk-based Office for European Expertise and Communication was among the co-organisers' of the event.
The Belarus Committee of ICOMOS announces the collection of cases on the effectiveness of the State List of Historical and Cultural Values as a tool of the safeguarding the cultural monuments.
On March 27-28, the Belarus ICOMOS and the EuroBelarus held an online expert workshop on expanding opportunities for community participation in the governance of historical and cultural heritage.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.
"Specificity is different, but the priority is general." In Valożyn, a local strategy for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
The campaign "Agenda 50" was summed up in Ščučyn, and a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed there.
The regional center has become the second city in Belarus where the local plan for the implementation of the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
Representatives of the campaign “Agenda 50” from five pilot cities discussed achievements in creating local agendas for implementing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
It is noteworthy that out of the five pilot cities, Stoubcy was the last to join the campaign “Agenda 50”, but the first one to complete the preparation of the local agenda.
On May 28, the city hosted a presentation of the results of the project "Equal to Equal" which was dedicated to monitoring the barrier-free environment in the city.
On March 3, members of the campaign "Agenda 50" from different Belarusian cities met in Minsk. The campaign is aimed at the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
In Stolin, social organizations and local authorities are implementing a project aimed at independent living of persons with disabilities, and creating local agenda for the district.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.