From discussing the results of the parliamentary election campaign in Belarus, which is to be held on October 11-12 at the European Parliament, nothing should be expected.
This opinion was expressed by a political analyst Andrei Yahorau, director of the Centre for European Transformation, in a conversation with the EuroBelarus Information Service.
"This is a fairly regular event accompanying the electoral campaign in Belarus, when the Belarusan political scene representatives of democratic parties are invited to the various European structures in order to make some reports about what has happened in Belarus. It is always a rather formal event on the exchange of information, the official position to clarify the situation, nothing more", said the expert.
According to him, such activities cause no consolidation processes. "The Europeans do not influence the decision of the issue of consolidation in Belarus in this case, besides the things they are doing as it is. For example, while establishing a framework for the dialogue on modernization, Europe would like to see a subject which it would be possible to talk with inside the country. Europe would see this subject as a consolidated alliance of democratic political parties and rather broadly represented civil society subjects. And in this case, the European Union could relate to what is going on in Belarus, in a more serious way", considers Andrei Yahorau.
However, in his view, the problem of interaction and influence of the EU instruments in Belarus stumbles upon the fact that in Belarus, there is no subject and no coherent strategy that the United Europe would be able to back. "And as far as there is no such strategy, there is essentially nothing to support for the European Union. Such a tragic mismatch comes out: the EU would be ready and would enhance any strategic actions of the democratic forces in Belarus, but in view of the fact that these are not consolidated and do not have a joint strategy, the EU is disabled to realize its pia desideria", explained the political analyst.
He pointed to the fact that the format of the meeting involves political opposition exactly in the form of political actors. "And, of itself, it is not rather adequate to the actual situation as political parties are indistinguishable from civil society organizations in essence of their actions and respective capabilities, resources, etc. They are in the same situation", said the expert.
In his view, artificial segmentation of Belarusan civil society on political and non-political subjects by European politicians is irrelevant to the tasks that are to be addressed by the entire democratic community of our country. "This segmentation creates a very difficult situation for our civil society because currently in Europe, very important issues for our country are being discussed, but these are being discussed with politicians who, in principle, can’t influence the situation. And the very civil society is excluded from discussing these issues, conversations, making any decisions. Although it has a very clearly pronounced position on what has happened during the election campaign, and in what direction to move on", said Andrei Yahorau.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.