If it will be opposition who wins the presidential elections in Venezuela, the relations with Belarus could become chillier. However, such change won’t bring serious damage to the Belarusan economy.
This opinion to the EuroBelarus Information Service shared Andrei Yahorau, political scientist, the director of the Centre for European transformation.
Over a period of 30 days after Hugo Chavez’s death new presidential elections are to take place. The main presidential aspirants are Chavez’s successor Nicolás Maduro and the leader of the untied opposition Henrique Capriles who opposed Chavez at the elections of October 2012.
Andrei Yahorau believes that in case the power in Venezuela will go to the successor of Hugo Chavez, then we have to expect the continuation of cooperation with Belarus practically in the same regime that it was before. Of course, to mend the relations on personal level some time is required. However, on the whole the cooperation of the two countries will be continued.
There is no doubt that mutual understanding between Hugo Chavez and Aliaksandr Lukashenka in person played its role. “Still, the relations between Belarus and Venezuela were mutually beneficial. Of course, they were strengthened by the relations of two dictatorships and two dictators directly. But as the two states find this cooperation advantageous both economically and symbolically, it means that such cooperation will be preserved”, - highlighted Andrei Yahorau.
But in case democratic opposition forces come to power in Venezuela, we can expect their decisive actions to restore relations with the US, which is the main force at the geopolitical area in Latin America, the political scientist assumes. In this case we can hardly expect that the cooperation between Belarus and Venezuela will remain the same. In order to improve relations with the democratic states the relations with such countries as Belarus would acquire second priority.
But there is no saying that the cutback on cooperation with Venezuela will hit at the Belarusan economy. “There was no large trade volume between Belarus and Venezuela. So in any case, the losses will be not that huge. Of course, it can damage some private issues, but Belarus won’t suffer seriously in the dealings between the two countries”.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.