Elena Tonkacheva is doubtful whether Justas Paleckis’s report is politically consistent
23.05.2013 |Politics| EuroBelarus Information Service,
The head of the Legal Transformation Centre “Lawtrend” shared her views concerning the draft report submitted by Justas Paleckis, Rapporteur on Belarus from the European Parliament.
In the comment provided to the EuroBelarus Information Service by “Lawtrend” Elena Tonkacheva expressed her opinion about the draft report “from the human rights and professional judicial prospective”:
“1. I believe there are no actual grounds to state the improvement of the situation in the human rights sphere in Belarus. This assertion not only fails to correspond to the actual facts but also creates false factors (grounds) for refusing (revising) the policies towards Belarus announced by the EU earlier.
2. I believe that unfounded (i.e. not backed up with new changes) rethink of the EU’s policies aimed at the development of collaboration with the Belarusan government is leveling basic values of the unified Europe: human rights, democracy and supremacy of law.
3. I believe that the formats of the EU “Eastern Partnership” and “Dialog on Modernization” programs should be subject to the responsible evaluation and reassessment. By responsible evaluation I understand returning to evaluating programs’ startup (preparation, accommodation, progress estimate of goals, the programs’ conformity to the national conditions), choice of the players for coordinated action, consistency in standards’ promotion, transparency of procedures and mechanisms, participation of the civil society in these processes and factual voice of the civil society”, - Elena Tonkacheva noted.
At that she doubted the report of Justas Paleckis as to its compliance with the principles stated by the EU and its political consistency. Elena Tonkacheva reasoned her position with the fact that:
“1. Belarus still has political prisoners.
2. Belarus didn’t give legal appraisal of the politically reasoned disappearances (Yury Zacharanka, Viktar Hanchar, Zmicier Zavadsky, Anatol Krasouski).
3. Belarus continues applying death penalty.
4. Belarus has no factual improvements in the sphere of the freedom of speech, freedom of associations, freedom of meetings, discrimination problems, and tortures.
5. Belarus has no mechanisms for citizen participation: elections, referendums, direct legislative initiative, mechanisms that allow citizens to participate in decision-making processes”, - is said in the comment of the head of the Legal Transformation Centre.
Let us recall that the draft report will be subject to further scrutiny at one of the sessions of the European Parliament. Upon preparing the report Justas Paleckis visited Minsk on March 18-21 to meet with the officials and the representatives of the Belarusan civil society.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.