On July 9, 2013 the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee approved a report on the situation in Belarus.
This report was submitted by Justas Paleckis, the EP's rapporteur on Belarus, and was assigned for the European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the European External Action Service.
Fifty-five members of the Committee voted for the document, one voted against and five abstained, reports Belsat.
In the initial version of his report Justas Paleckis, Vice-chair for the EP Delegation for relations with Belarus, said that an improvement of the situation of human rights was discernible in 2012 and the European Dialogue on Modernisation with Belarusian society launched in 2012 has had a positive impact on the development of civil society in Belarus, and offered a number of recommendations. Later Mr Paleckis insisted that his report was based on information published on the human rights website www.spring96.org, which allegedly reported a threefold decrease in the number of arrests, searches and other repressive instances in Belarus in 2012.
At the same time, the EP Rapporteur on Belarus recommends considering “the suspension of key officials from the EU visa ban list with a view to broadening the main and essential diplomatic communication channel with Belarus, also in view of the Eastern Partnership summit” and “increasing contacts with officials in order to foster openness of mind towards the EU and to enhance EU-Belarus cooperation”.
The report drew indignation among Belarusian opposition activists and human rights defenders. According to Mr Paleckis, more than 300 amendments and suggestions have been submitted with regard to the report. In one of the interviews Justas Paleckis said he regretted having said that the human rights situation in Belarus had improved.
Let us recall that Justas Paleckis visited Minsk on March 18-21 to collect data for his report that will be submitted for the vote at the European Parliament later.
After the discussion of the report on Belarus at the conference of the European Parliament Committee for Foreign Affairs the report will be also considered at a plenary session of the European Parliament in September.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.