In spring 2008, Sweden and Poland initiated work on the Eastern Partnership — a more ambitious policy for the EU vis-à-vis six Eastern European neighbours seeking closer relations with the Union.
Now — five years later and in the run-up to the third Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius — we will embark on a joint trip that will take us and other high-level Swedish and Polish representatives to all the Eastern Partnership capitals: to Chisinau, Kyiv, Tbilisi, Baku, Yerevan and Minsk.
The first message that we will bring is about all that has already been achieved: we have finalized work on Association Agreements and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine that, once signed, will lead to broader and more profound co-operation with the EU. We have signed a host of Visa Facilitation Agreements, most recently with Armenia. And here and there we have seen some significant progress on the European reform agenda. While much of the work has been about negotiating dry texts and adjusting bureaucratic standards, we have step by step opened very real doors for trade and travel.
Our second message will be about what needs to be done for the Eastern Partnership to deliver in full. For this to happen, we need a stronger commitment from our partner countries to common values. We also need a concerted effort from all parts of society to make the most out of the new opportunities. Real transformation will only happen in countries that decide in favour of change.
We stand firm in our demand that Belarus must release its political prisoners and we call upon partners to stay clear of practices of selective justice. We are concerned about democratic backsliding. And we still wait for Ukraine — the original front runner of this partnership — to take the final step that will allow the EU to sign the Association Agreement in Vilnius.
As frequent visitors to Eastern Europe, we know that some of these things are not easy. What the European Union is asking may include sacrifices, and for some — even losses. But at the same time, we are deeply convinced that the gains are bigger and the effort is worth making.
All studies — and all experience — show that closer relations with the European Union bring considerable economic benefits over time. We have seen this in the countries that joined the EU in 2004, when for example Poland’s trade with Sweden almost doubled during the years immediately following accession. We have seen it in Turkey, which has had its economic miracle underpinned by closer economic ties with the EU. And we are convinced that we will see it again in those Eastern European partner countries that sign and make full use of the new agreements on offer with the EU.
Closer integration with the Union will provide an anchor for reforms. Adjusting legislation to the EU acquis may be frustrating, but in country after country we have seen how this has helped increase prosperity, raise income levels and improve the lives of ordinary citizens. The EU will, of course, be ready to assist. In 2013 alone, over 600 million euros are available for our partner countries, and the more they reform the greater the support will become.
None of this is pure altruism, or part of a zero-sum game. Countries that are stable, prosperous and secure make better neighbors for us, just like they do for countries such as Russia. During our trip, we will therefore reiterate our strong solidarity with those partners that are subject to short-sighted external pressure to abandon further EU integration.
The Vilnius Summit will hopefully be a summit of achievement. At the same time, it will mark the beginning of deeper integration between the EU and the countries of Eastern Europe. This is a good thing for all of us. And while we believe that the door to the EU must remain open for any European country that wishes to join and fulfils all the criteria, our final message during this round trip will not be an abstract promise, but a practical encouragement to take action.
From Minsk in north-west to Baku in south-east, everyone must understand that the future will be decided there — not in Warsaw, Stockholm or Brussels. For Eastern Partnership countries the logic is simple: the depth of their relationship with the EU will ultimately be determined by nothing else but the depth of their commitment. The more convincing the agenda of European reforms, the more ambitious the path of European integration — and the more realistic our vision of a Europe that is truly whole and free.
Reference
Carl Bildt. Born in 1949. Higher education, Stockholm University.
1976 - 1978 - Special Adviser for coordination functions in the Government.
1979 - 2001 - Member of the Riksdag
1986 - 1999 - Party leader of the Moderate Party
1991 - 1994 - Prime Minister
2006 - Minister for Foreign Affairs
1995 - 1997 - The European Union's Special Representative for Former Yugoslavia 1995, Co-Chair of the Dayton Peace Talks on Former Yugoslavia
1999 - 2001 - UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy for the Balkans
Radosław Sikorski was born on 23rd February 1963 in Bydgoszcz, Poland. He graduated from the University of Oxford with a B.A. and an M.A. in Politics, Philosophy and Economics (PPE). Sikorski headed the students’ strike committee during the unrest in Bydgoszcz in March 1981. He was granted political asylum in Great Britain in 1982-89. He was a war correspondent in Afghanistan and Angola in 1986-89. He won the World Press Photo award in 1987 for a photograph taken in Afghanistan. As Deputy Minister of National Defence in 1992. In 1998-2001 he served as Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs. From 2002 to 2005, he was resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C. and executive director of the New Atlantic Initiative. Radosław Sikorski was elected senator for Bydgoszcz in 2005 and served as Minister of National Defence in 2005-2007. In 2007, he was elected to the Lower House of the Polish Parliament (the Sejm) from the Civic Platform list. He was sworn in as Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland on 16 November 2007.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.