After Crimean referendum Russia-Ukraine conflict has entered a new phase. Russia-Ukraine relations, and even Russia's relations with the countries of Eastern Europe, have drastically changed.
According to political analyst Andrei Kazakevich, the director of the Institute for Policy Studies Palіtychnaya Sphera (Political Sphere), Russia went the length of intervening in affairs of the neighboring states by funding political parties, bribing presidents, using media capabilities. But the occupation of Crimea is another story: in this case Russia has gone beyond the mark. “Now everyone is witnessing that the world is totally at sea: nobody knows how the situation should be taken. The EU, the USA are at loss along with most analysts who failed to predict such a scenario. In fact, after Russia played the game conventionally and lost twice, in 2004 and in February, 2014, it has decided to move the goalposts,” Kazakevich stresses.
In his opinion, for the last five years chauvinistic and nationalist sentiments have been overriding among Russian society, including the government. “Probably, since the mid-2000s they have been shifting to the idea of Russia's possessing the right to intervene. The issue of “one nation” has been mooted; the first signs of Russian authorities' Ukraine-phobia revealed themselves.”
According to media reports, there were cases of handing over small Russian flags to passers-by in the streets of Belarusian cities. Could this be regarded as another Russia's attack on our country?
“The current developments have mobilized the nationalist “Russian line”. Some 20% of the Belarusians could take it positively because they constantly look back at Russia, they watch Russian TV. Belarus turned out to be very susceptible in the information context because a lot of ideas which were brought about from Moscow worked and mobilized pro-Russian sentiments,” Andrei Kazakevich said.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.