Due to its neutral stance over the crisis in Ukraine, the official Minsk expects Brussels to suspend sanctions unconditionally.
The fact that the EU has removed some businesses and state officials from the sanctions list could be interpreted as a result of more intense political contact between Belarus and the EU. In addition, the Belarusian authorities hope the EU will continue to make concessions. Also, headway could be made in Belarusian-European negotiations on non-political issues, such as visa liberalisation and economic cooperation. However, the Belarusian authorities are not showing any willingness to take reciprocal steps towards Brussels, primarily, to release political prisoners.
On October 30th, the EU extended sanctions against Belarusian government officials and businesses for a year, removing 24 officials and 7 businesses from the sanctions list.
Brussels’ decision to reduce the sanctions list by removing some Belarusian businesses and individuals was long anticipated by Belarus. The Belarusian Foreign Ministry called the decision “a step in the right direction” and underscored that the extension of “restrictions against a number of Belarusian citizens and companies is another lost opportunity to remove the main hindrance on the way towards normalizing our relations and to start substantive work for the sake of building mutually beneficial cooperation in the interests of our citizens”.
It is worth noting that Belarus has made it clear that further development of Belarusian-European cooperation will only be possible if the EU lifts sanctions against Belarusian officials and companies. For example, according to Belarusian officials, Brussels has delayed the visa liberalisation negotiations between Belarus and the EU, which started after the summit in Vilnius in 2013. Belarus’ Deputy Foreign Minister Kupchina cited sanctions as the main reason for delaying the visa policy negotiations between Belarus and the EU: "We understand that they - these sanctions - are the main obstacle in our relations with the European Union. I am sure, that if they were removed, our cooperation with the EU and some Member States could very quickly reach a qualitative new level.”
Meanwhile, Belarus is not planning any reciprocal political measures towards the EU, for instance, to release political prisoners. Belarus seeks to improve her relations with the EU by increasing her importance in ensuring regional security in Europe and by staking on the priority of geopolitical factors in the EU’s foreign policy.
To some extent, Belarus has succeeded in imposing her agenda in negotiations with the EU and can further count on enhancing Belarusian-European relations and gradually excluding political conditions from the Belarus-EU negotiations. For example, when asked about the visa sanctions, DFM Kupchina said, “I see that this understanding is growing in European societies and in political circles".
The Belarusian opposition remains split over conditions for normalization of Belarus-EU relations. Some opposition parties, such as the pro-European movement "For Freedom" and the Belarusian Popular Front welcomed greater cooperation between the Belarusian leadership and business and their European partners, thus hoping to weaken the Kremlin’s influence in Belarus. Other opposition leaders and political émigrés are hoping that Western capitals will retain the conditionality of a political dialogue with Belarus and that Brussels will keep the focus on human rights, regardless of the geopolitical context.
Incidentally, the EU’s decision to extend the sanctions until October 31st, 2015 was specifically motivated by the fact that “not all political prisoners have been released and rehabilitated, and the respect for human rights, the rule of law and democratic principles has not significantly improved in Belarus”. However, amid such a public rhetoric, one cannot but note the enhancement of Belarus-EU relations, which, in turn could result in the sanctions list being trimmed.
Belarus will continue negotiating with Brussels and insisting on removing political conditions by referring to the growing threats to regional security in Europe and emphasizing her neutral position in relation to the crisis in Ukraine.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.