Thursday 23 September 2021 | 21:04

Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka’s national concept is all about rushing

18.11.2014  |  Politics   |  Aliaksei Jurych, EuroBelarus,  
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka’s national concept is all about rushing

Linguistic peculiarities don’t make Smolensk and Briansk Belarusan territories; neophytes are as dangerous as the concept of the “Russian World” is.

On November 11 “World Russian People's Council” adopted a declaration of Russian identity. The authors of the concept are hoping to unite the Russian-speaking population of the whole world in the face of the challenges Putin’s rule set before Russia.

The essence of the “Russian identity”, its goals and threats “EuroBelarus” Information Service discussed with Uladzimir Matskevich, the head of the Board of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”.

- The World Russian People's Council adopted a declaration of Russian identity. What is that?

- When a country is in crisis, different forces are looking for means to raise the spirits, mobilize the population, to make people be motivated when withstanding political, economic, and other hardships. Often archaic and primitive methods are used for these purposes.

Declaration is an attempt to mobilize Russian population for humility with the situation Putin’s rule created.

- Russia is identifying Russians. What is the aim of this action? Is it to establish the boundaries of the Russian World that should be protected?

- Starting from the 80s different ethnical, national, almost racist theories regarding the purity of the Russian people were cultivated. For a long time the authorities didn’t give any reaction to all these trends, assuming that they bring no visible harm. However, cultivation of Russian, ethnical, and national has led to throwing all non-Russians overboard of “Russian unity”. That is why super-ethnical forms of unity have appeared.

As the time has shown, ethnical theories are not suitable for Russia; the notion “Russians” hasn’t yet become a uniting factor.

That is where the need to change the image of “Russians” appeared; and that is when the theory for ethnical non-Russians was born. This theory includes all Russian-speakers to the notion “a Russian”. However, emphasis on the Russian language is very dangerous and might bring conflicts and even open wars.

- How does identification of Russians fits in the current Kremlin’s policy? Brzezinski noted that Putin’s logic might bring him to protection of Russians in New York.

- The concept of the Russian World suggested by the Russian intellectuals didn’t presuppose that Russian-speaking population outside Russia would be protected. But there will always be politicians who will use good intentions for mean purposes.

It turned out that traditional concepts are unable to unite the “Russian World” so that it is able to compete with common European or Christian values. That is when the simplification of the concept happened: Russian language and protection of Russians outside Russia, which led to denial of such peoples ad Ukrainian and Belarusan and an attempt to think that all Eastern are Slavs Russians. This concept is very dangerous; however, politicians and intellectuals underestimate this danger.

Why it was the Russian Orthodox Church and Patriarch Kirill who started the identification of Russians?

- The participation of the Russian Orthodox Church is no coincidence: it has a number of ideas with the help of which it intends to keep the neighboring territories in the sphere of Russian influence. There is a concept of “canonical orthodoxy territory” in accordance to which Belarus is included in this territory. This theory believes that all other religions  - Protestantism, Uniatism, and Catholicism – are borrowed and should be limited if not suppressed.

It means that territory starts defining a human’s conscience.

There are such concepts in Belarus as well, but we shouldn’t connect the territory of the state with the national identity. Thus, Belarusan language was used far beyond Belarus, which led to the wrong conclusion that these territories, including Briansk and Smolensk, belong to us. However, linguistic peculiarities of the regions don’t make their citizens Belarusans. These theories are as harmful as is the concept of the “Russian World”.

- But the same thing has been happening in Belarus during the last 20 years, hasn’t it? The only difference is that it is Lukashenka who picks out outsiders, “the fifth column”, “and electorate”. But if the “Russian World” is at least formally aimed at reaching unity among people, then Lukashenka’s actions lead to disunion of Belarusans.

- Russian chauvinism and imperial thinking are subject to certain fluctuations; however, they have long-lasting effect, whereas Lukashenka’s national concept is a short-term factor that is all about rushing. When Lukashenka was dreaming about the renovation of the USSR and about moving from Minsk to Moscow, he denied Belarusans’ national identity: he called Belarusan language “underdeveloped” and thought that Belarusans are Russians but with a “mark of quality”. Basically, he was trying to join the concept of the “Russian World”.

After his dreams to occupy the throne in Kremlin, Lukashenka became more tolerant to the national idea, and now we see his clear overtures with the national idea. Belarus regime is characterized by inconsistency and rushing.

Well, rushing is also typical for many Belarusans, and that created a whole new army of neophytes – people, who were initially indifferent to all Belarusan but who rushed to defend Belarusianism all of a sudden. Instead of developing healthy nationalism and be guided by classics, neophytes generate precocious ideas such as “Smolensk is ours”. However, in Belarus it can be accounted for the development problem.

On the whole, national question is too delicate a question that requires discipline and moral responsibility so that not to make mistakes and unreasoned decisions, as we can pay too much for such mistakes. 

Other news section «Politics»

Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
The Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum issued a statement on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia.
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan cities.
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
"Case of Zhadan" demonstrated that Belarus does not actually have a clear policy - neither domestic nor foreign.
Belarus
Belarus's Lukashenko alleges “fifth column” plot as unrest continues
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
The relationship between Russia and Belarus has never been an easy one.
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
But even under the circumstances the authorities have various ways out.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
But Lukashenka is afraid for his fate and position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
There should be no actual passport control for the Belarusians arriving in Russia within the framework of the existing Belarusian-Russian agreements.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
It is a process of normalization of Belarus-EU relations. Belarus just fulfils its international commitments.
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Political analyst emphasizes that Belarus is the first modern authoritarianism in the European space, a phenomenon not yet studied by anyone.
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.