Solidarity with Belarus Information Office prepared a summary of development of the political and economic situation in Belarus in 2014 and a forecast for 2015.
Socio-economic processes in Belarus in 2014 were shaped by a serious regional crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, as well as the Belarusian authorities’ preparations for the re-election of Aleksandr Lukashenko. These events strengthened Lukashenko’s position in the eyes of the Belarusian population, but led to further disbalances in the Belarusian economy. As a result, Belarus is entering 2015 with a major currency crisis and a significant turnover in government members. The change in government was partially due to the ageing state apparatus, however, the more youthful staff will not be able to change the principles of government, at least until the presidential election is over.
Most important trends in 2014:
- Lukashenko’s popularity continued to rise despite the fall in real incomes;
- The Belarusian government maintained a careful balancing act between Russian, Ukraine, and the EU;
- Economic potential was lost in an attempt to wait out the crisis;
- The Belarusian government attempted to distance Belarus from the regional economic crisis, mainly via administrative and managerial decisions;
- High level of demand for change in Belarusian society persisted.
Main threats in 2015:
- Tensions and protest moods in society will rise due to falling living standards and a lack of adequate solutions to the currency-financial crisis, which is likely to worsen;
- Trade conflicts with Russia and informational aggression from the Kremlin against the Belarusian leadership will be more likely.
Most likely trends for 2015:
- The economic recession will continue;
- Real incomes and social benefits will continue to fall;
- Attempts to curb the economic crisis using administrative measures will continue, but the most important economic decisions will be taken in 2015 (devaluation is expected at the start of the year)
- Conditions for political activity will remain repressive;
- Relations with the Kremlin will bear a conflicting character, particularly in the media sphere, but this will not prevent Belarus from participating in Russia’s integration projects, nor receiving financial aid from Russia;
- Relations with the West will improve to some extent.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.