Belarus National Bank adopted certain measures so that to stabilize Belarus’ financial situation, managing to address currency exchange market problems without social discontent growing.
However, the measures adopted by the government and the National Bank have led to personal income freezing, or even falling, which goes against the traditional state policy of pumping up household income in the year of the presidential elections, which will have an adverse effect on the authorities’ popularity. In the future, this could lead to a contradiction between the actions and statements of the Executive Office of the President, government, and the National Bank, as well as to officials being increasingly criticized by the president.
President Lukashenka is trying to bring on board professionals who have proven to be relatively successful in managing crises on the currency exchange market within the current socio-economic model. Key staff changes within the government and the National Bank were made over the Christmas holiday period in order to soften the public’s reaction at a time when the population is concerned with the limitations on the currency exchange market. The head of state has not blamed the previous teams of the government and the National Bank for failures in the country’s socio-economic development. However, president Lukashenka has underlined his readiness to use “another reserve of personnel” after the election.
Meanwhile, in early January the National Bank’s new management has managed to address the problems on the currency exchange market by carrying out another devaluation of the national currency by 26%, although originally there had been plans for a single currency exchange rate by February 1st. It is worth mentioning that the new head of the National Bank, Pavel Kalaur, has some experience in dealing with currency exchange crises, having worked at the National Bank for 17 years. It was precisely when Kalaur was a deputy head of the National Bank that a one-time devaluation of the national currency was held, and earlier, in 2000, he led a team which had a single currency exchange rate as its goal.
At the same time, the year of the presidential elections is usually a year when Belarusians see a significant growth in their personal income. But this time, the Belarusian state cannot guarantee such a growth (which was usually artificially created using domestic resources) without risking yet another currency devaluation. Despite the president’s statements on the need to increase personal income, the current government and the new team at the National Bank are picking up where the previous authorities left off, namely limiting the growth of the wages and sustaining the stability of the exchange rate. Introducing the new head of the National Bank, the president defined his duties: “The most important thing today is the stability of the national currency. We face a strategic task – to strengthen the trust of the population in the national currency – the Belarusian ruble.”
It is worth mentioning that since summer 2014, wage growth in Belarus has been de-facto frozen, and living standards even fell after the national currency was devalued by 30% at the start of this year.
President Lukashenka continues to view the staffing policy as a basis for sharpening the current socio-economic model’s efficiency. The new head of the President’s Executive Office, Kosinets, underlines growth in performance discipline as the most important of his primary goals in his new office: “Discipline is the mother of victory. If there isn’t discipline, there won’t be a victory. That’s why there should be discipline everywhere. The heart of the problem lies in another thing. There are terms “strictness” and “humaneness”. Alongside strictness, there should also be humaneness.”
Most likely, during the year of the presidential elections, the government’s main objective will be to keep the population’s standards of living at an acceptable level by curbing inflation and price rises. The Belarusian authorities will continue to prop up the currency exchange market without changing the socio-economic model or carrying out structural reforms of the economy. In addition, official Minsk will step up the search for foreign borrowing, which might provide a certain growth of personal income – but minus the risk of yet another devaluation.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.