Saturday 18 May 2024 | 04:30

Leanid Zaika: If Obama decides to play against Russia, IMF will give Belarus a loan

16.03.2015  |  Politics   |  Aliaksei Jurych,  EuroBelarus
Leanid Zaika: If Obama decides to play against Russia, IMF will give Belarus a loan

Kremlin will be investing in Belarus until Lukashenka makes a couple of serious mistakes.

Regular IMF mission is working on March 5-16 in Minsk. It is an open secret that Belarusan authorities are expecting to get a new loan from the IMF. However, as long ago as last week IMF representatives of stated that the foundation could start preparations to the new program on the assumption of serious reforms in the economy. However, reforms in Belarus are not even in the air.

Lukashenka’s visit to Moscow seems to have a sad end – Belarusan leader left for home without money.

In 2015 Belarus has to return about $4 billion of external debt, and return $1 billion Eurobonds before August.

Where should we get money? Leanid Zaika, the head of the analytical center “Strategia” (Strategy), talks about it in the interview with the EuroBelarus Information Service.

- What are the hopes of the official Minsk for IMF’s loan?

- Washington is the last to vote. If Obama decides to play against Russia, IMF will give Belarus a loan.

On March 3 Lukashenka visited Moscow, and it seems that Kremlin didn’t give anything to him. Lukashenka has already crossed several red lines in relations with Russia. First, he talked about the “Eastern Partnership” and possible participation in it, despite the fact that the “Eastern Partnership” is an anti-Kremlin project of the West. Secondly, Lukashenka voiced some impartial things for Kremlin re Crimea and Ukraine.

Now Belarus has stuck; it should pay about $4 billion of external debt, or about $300 million monthly. Kremlin decided to sustain a pause and see how Lukashenka rushes about from the West to the East.

Obama and the EU might allocate $1.5-$2 millions to Belarus for it to become more flexible and changeable. Washington is taking the final decision, and IMF is playing the role of a purse in this case.

In 2015 Russia is giving 23 million tons of oil to Belarus, and these tons might bring up to $10 billion extra income to the state treasury. Of course, the sum depends on the prices on oil at the world market.

- But anyway, the official Minsk should fulfill minimum of IMF’s terms to get a loan, shouldn’t it?

- One can promise whatever he or she wants; and Belarusan government has become skilled as anyone in it.

But it is useful for the IMF to give loans, as it always has what to get back. Belarus has a state property of $100 billion, and it can always bring pressure to any country and return the debts.

Reforms that were discussed at the negotiations between Belarusan authorities and the IMF are just nonsense. The IMF is a commercial organization that is earning money; international and Belarusan officials are together in their nomenclature bond and also earn money with that.

- On March 13 the government published a list of about 60 Belarusan enterprises that are to be privatized in 2015. Is it mere eyewash for the IMF of the state is really intended to privatize them?

- These lists appear each year and can be compared to the lists of university entrants: someone will enter the university, someone won’t, and a university might get closed… One shouldn’t be very attentive to that.

- How much can university get at the expense of privatization? Earlier the authorities planned to get $800-850 million from it, whereas last year privatization put $42 million in the state treasury.

- Now we are undergoing crisis. Money are invested into natural recourses production or new energy production, while there is little sense to buy, let’s say, Ivacevichi woodworking plant. The assets that come to Belarus are either adventurist or capital cover.

- Belarus’ external debt outstepped the line of $40 billion, and $4 billion have to be paid off in 2015. According to different assessments, the state will have to find $5-6 billion extra in order to prevent further decrease of the living standard among Belarusans. How will the state get out of this situation?

- In any country the population pays off the debts of the state: the state takes away money from the current income or takes away property. Now the salary is $400; it will decrease to $350, then to $200 – we can do nothing about it. Pensioners survive with only $107, but still go to polling stations and vote diligently.

- Anyway, the official Minsk won’t stop its attempts to borrow money elsewhere. Who can give it to the Belarusan authorities?

- It might be Kremlin. Kremlin was very interested that Belarus doesn’t go anywhere else as it lives in the Union State. Although this Union State seems “weird”: Russia introduced embargo for European goods, whereas Belarus that is a part of the Union State doesn’t. Moreover, Lukashenka goes to Moscow, meets with Putin and both of them pretend that nothing has happened.

However, Kremlin has already reduced the level of trust to Lukashenka and will be working more thoroughly with the Belarusan elites. Kremlin will be investing in Belarus until Lukashenka makes a couple of serious mistakes, as hungry and jobless Belarusans will stop loving Russia.

Other news section «Politics»

Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
The Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum issued a statement on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia.
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan cities.
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
"Case of Zhadan" demonstrated that Belarus does not actually have a clear policy - neither domestic nor foreign.
Belarus
Belarus's Lukashenko alleges “fifth column” plot as unrest continues
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
The relationship between Russia and Belarus has never been an easy one.
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
But even under the circumstances the authorities have various ways out.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
But Lukashenka is afraid for his fate and position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
There should be no actual passport control for the Belarusians arriving in Russia within the framework of the existing Belarusian-Russian agreements.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
It is a process of normalization of Belarus-EU relations. Belarus just fulfils its international commitments.
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Political analyst emphasizes that Belarus is the first modern authoritarianism in the European space, a phenomenon not yet studied by anyone.
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.