Belarusan National Platform of the Civil Society assessed the election campaign 2015
04.12.2015 |Politics| Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF,
The participants of the conference “The National Platform development: new challenges, new strategies”, which took place on November 28-29 in Minsk, summed up the results of the presidential election.
Position
of the Belarusan National Platform
of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum
“On the civil and political situation in Belarus after the presidential election”
On the final assessment of the presidential election
Basing on the presidential election assessments given by the participants of the Belarusan National Platform, namely on the published reports of the Belarusian human rights organizations within the frames of the campaign “Human Rights Defenders for Free Elections” and the Belarusian Association of Journalists within the frames of the “The coverage of the president elections 2015 in Belarusan media” we state:
- the election of President of the Republic of Belarus 2015 cannot be recognized as free, open, and equal;
- the results of the election cannot be recognized as the reflection of voters’ will.
The following facts noted by the representatives of the civil society organizations made the basis of the given assessment:
- the electoral process didn’t correspond to the key international standards of holding democratic and free elections;
- in the course of the election equal access to mass media for all candidates wasn’t provided;
- the work of the election commissions cannot be assessed as impartial;
- in the course of the election administrative resources were extensively used for the benefit of the incumbent President;
- in the course of the election numerous facts of voters’ constraint to take part in early voting were indicated;
- the counting of votes continually lacked transparency and was restricted for observation.
We also have to state that as early as during the preparation to election the opposition political forces didn’t make use of the existing political opportunities for building a constructive dialog both between themselves as well as with the Belarusian civil society so that to build a consolidated action strategy during the electoral campaign. Such actions made any participation in the campaign politically pointless long before its start. Basically, all actions of all the opposition forces – both those, who took part in the election, as well as those, who left the electoral campaign not long before its started – acted in the favor of the authorities.
Discord and conflicts between the opposition forces due to participation or non-participation (both on the eve of the campaign and during the campaign), as well as their actions during the elections only led to the exaggerated interest to the initially illegitimate and essentially manipulative electoral process with no real control over its quality and correspondence to the conventional international norms.
Thus, it is the Belarusan authorities that are responsible for the general conclusion – non-transparent and non-democratic elections; however, to a certain degree all key figures of Belarusan political opposition also bear responsibility for it.
The participants of the Belarusan National Platform call on all interested parties to engage in a dialog re the actual state of the political situation in the country, as well as common actions aimed at its changing. Without such dialog we see no opportunities for sensible and real actions in the political sphere.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.