The statement of the Belarusan National Platform on the abolition of EU sanctions against Belarus
20.02.2016 |Politics| Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF,
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the cancellation of the Council of the EU most of the sanctions against the Belarusan authorities.
Statement
of the Belarusan National Platform
of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum
“On the EU Council conclusions on Belarus dated February 15, 2016”
18 February 2016
We, the participants of the Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, after closely examining the EU Council Decision on Belarus adopted at the meeting of 15 February 2016 in Brussels, state the following:
The cancellation of the European Union’s (EU) restrictive measures against Belarusan officials responsible for politically motivated reprisals and the use of violence against citizens who peacefully voiced their political views during the 2010 presidential election campaign sends a contradictory message to Belarusan society as Belarus has seen no real democratic change in the last five years;
We welcome the efforts of the EU, its member States, international institutions, human rights organizations and other actors who made it possible to remove the issue of political prisoners from the agenda in the August 2015 in Belarus. We also appreciate and support the return of the EU and the Republic of Belarus to the Human Rights Dialogue. At the same time during the last six months we have repeatedly noted human rights violations, and the ignoring of interests, as well as the use of various forms of pressure and repression and a lack of constructive communication by the representatives of the Belarusan authorities in relation to social groups such as students, journalists, entrepreneurs, cultural activists and others. The presidential election in 2015 was recognized by the OSCE as being inconsistent with international standards. This indicates the unwillingness of the Belarusan authorities to take deliberate, systematic and consistent steps to establish mutually beneficial relations between the EU and Belarus on the basis of internationally accepted values and norms, as well as the absence of any effort to reach an acceptable understanding between the authorities and independent actors in the Belarusan society$
The lifting of restrictive measures by the EU on a number of officials of the Republic of Belarus could, under certain circumstances, contribute to the creation of conditions for the improvement of relations between Belarus and the EU and the return of Belarusan society to a process of development rather than stagnation and preservation of accumulated diseases and contradictions. However, such a development is only possible in the case of the direct and equal inclusion into the discussion on socio-political issues, challenges and promising solutions of independent actors of the Belarusan society, in particular representatives of professional and business communities, religious faiths, the national cultural elite and, of course, a wide range of independent civil society organizations in Belarus$
Representatives of civil society organizations, united in the National Platform of EaP CSF are ready to make a constructive contribution to improving EU-Belarus relations and deploy their expertise and play a monitoring role, if the real conditions are created in Belarus for an inclusive and equitable socio-political dialogue, designed to consolidate society and to accelerate development as a part of European civilization$
Considering the forthcoming election campaigns in 2016 as an opportunity for the Belarusan authorities to demonstrate readiness for positive change and taking into account international opinion and standards, we emphasize the importance and the need to preserve and practice international human rights monitoring mechanisms in Belarus (the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation with human rights in Belarus etc.) and consider them as a necessary element of an independent assessment of the situation$
We once again draw the attention of the Belarusan authorities, the EU leadership and a broad range of stakeholders within our country and in the international community (to the position of the BNP EaP CSF “On the opening of the possibilities of European-Belarusan cooperation”) presented by us in November 2015. This assessed the situation of human rights observance in Belarus, as well as the specific mechanisms of cooperation, considered by us to be a priority at this stage of the Belarusan-European relations.
Belarusan civil society organizations — participants of the Belarusan National Platform of the EaP Civil Society Forum:
Ulad Vialichka, country facilitator for Belarus of the EaP CSF, co-chair of EaP CSF; International Consortium “EuroBelarus”;
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.