Thursday 28 March 2024 | 12:01

Uladzimir Matskevich: Dzmitryeu and Karatkevich behave properly — they entered the authorities’ game

25.02.2016  |  Politics   |  Evgeniy Balinskiy, specially for EuroBelarus.Info,  
Uladzimir Matskevich: Dzmitryeu and Karatkevich behave properly — they entered the authorities’ game

What relations with the opposition the authorities want to have? Why has Uladzimir Matskevich agreed to work at ONT? Why he doesn’t become politician himself since he knows and talks so much about it?

Philosopher and methodologist Uladzimir Matskevich answers these questions.

— What do you think about the meetings of the “Tell the Truth!” campaign leaders with the actual Belarusan parliamentarians?

— As soon as the “Tell the Truth!” campaign tries to have something their own way, they will immediately be thrown out. It will be just as it happened with me, when I was working at the Belarusan TV.

— How was it in your case?

— It happened in 2002, when it had been two years already that I stepped aside from any public opposition activity and had been working in business that has no relation to politics whatsoever. I got a call from Andrei Astraukh, the general producer of then newly-established ONT (Second National TV Channel, one of the Belarusan national pro-state TV channels. — EuroBelarus.Info), who asked if I could help the channel with the TV-show. Why not, I thought back then. I took to task and started making a TV-show for ONT to be offered to host the show, too. We recorded a pilot episode of the TV show, which everyone liked. Usually the first episodes are not broadcasted; but ours was.

It was at that time that I had a talk with our long-term TV boss Ryhor Kisel. In 1997 he threw me out from Belarusan TV (BT) for an “opposition” TV-program, so I asked him, whether he was ready to work with me for second time, being aware of my beliefs and my views. He answered positively, saying that the times changed. So I said yes to the offer.

And if in the beginning there really was certain freedom in the choice of topics and their discussion, after some time super-control over the content of the TV-show followed. In result, as soon as I tried to have it my way, despite the success of the TV-show, after Lukashenko had watched it, he ordered Kisel to throw me out and never let me back to TV again.

— How does this story relate with the history of the parliamentary meetings with “Tell the Truth”?

— Back then Kisel and I were discussing literature and opposition for hours, speaking Belarusan, and all the relations we established got destroyed as soon as the order from the heads came.

Now the regime needs to involve someone from the opposition in its circles, which will give it a hint of democracy. This is the only reason why all the tricks with Andrey Dzmitryeu and Tatstsyana Karatkevich are organized. These two have stepped the line, where they are not only invited to the meetings, but also can promote and advertise them. It means that they behave properly at these meetings.

— Why did you agree to work at ONT back then? Did you have any hopes or illusions?

— I had no illusions. I’m not afraid of losing myself: I know my position and I know that I will change it by no means. Besides, I don’t flatly reject the authorities — when something good is being done, why not take part in it? I want to be a professional; I have my ambitions. I knew I could make the best TV-show at the Belarusan television — why shouldn’t I do it? I can do it even now.

— There are always some intrigues, squabbling and quarrels, games with power, lies, and populism — why do you personally need to dig in this Belarusan political junk?

— This is not my primarily concern — I rather comment upon the developments in the country as a philosopher, analyst, and a conscious citizen. I made some serious efforts to preserve analytics as an institution in Belarus in the 1990s.

Well, I cannot make a big TV-show at the main TV-channels. But I’m creating “EuroBelarus” as a certain consortium that helps Belarusan civil society structures to survive and resolve their problems. I have been taking part in the formation of the Center of European Transformation, which continues the monitoring of political processes in Belarus; I am organizing the Flying University, where I am training a worthy replacement for me and my active colleagues.

I comment on everything that happens, knowing these things both theoretically and practically. I personally know all our socio-political leaders; I have spent a lot of meetings and talks with all of them. I just present my attitude to the situation — both in Facebook and in “Matskevich's Talk” program at Belsat TV as well as in numerous interviews.

— It looks like you know everything about politics. You usually lash at oppositionists: some make mistakes, some fall short of their target, some lie, some have no idea about what’s they doing, and so on. Why don’t you become a politician yourself and show an example to all the mediocrity, who only present themselves as politicians because non-state media say so?

— First, politics requires vocation. You see, I’m a person of vocation, from Latin vocare — to call. There are thousands of professions, but much fewer vocations; we can hardly count two dozens of them: politics, science, religion, war, medicine, and so on. Each of the vocations is tied to one of the fundamental values: religion is tied to God, science — to truth, law — to justice. Having a vocation, a person cannot but love the value tied to the vocation for realization of which (s)he is called into this world.

To sum it up, I don’t like power, I like truth. This is my vocation; that’s why I am a methodologist, or, to make it easier, a philosopher. I devote myself to methodology and philosophy in the sphere of humanitarian technologies, which also includes political technologies. That’s why I judge about politics as a methodologist. That’s where my judgments, analytics, and remarks come from.

— And secondly?

— Secondly, I have made several attempts to become a politician, each time differently: sometimes by cooperating with those, who thought that politics is their vocation; sometimes directly, by taking a political stance. And I have always been repulsed: both by the regime, by the opposition, by the NGOs, and so on. I was alone against everyone. I don’t want to war with my actual and potential supporters; but they immediately start warring with me, and for obvious reasons. My entry in the politics gives others no chance. For example, when I was trying to unite Uladzimir Niakliaeu and Aliaksandr Milinkevich, they were well aware that if they agreed on a union with me, even if it was the only way to success, they would have be satisfied with second roles. They had to pretend that they cooperate with me, but in reality they immediately started intriguing against me. This is the defective understanding of politics — intrigues in the fight for the first place. And while such defective image will stay, we will be having what we have, and I, certainly, have no place in such politics.

Other news section «Politics»

Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
The Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum issued a statement on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia.
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan cities.
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
"Case of Zhadan" demonstrated that Belarus does not actually have a clear policy - neither domestic nor foreign.
Belarus
Belarus's Lukashenko alleges “fifth column” plot as unrest continues
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
The relationship between Russia and Belarus has never been an easy one.
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
But even under the circumstances the authorities have various ways out.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
But Lukashenka is afraid for his fate and position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
There should be no actual passport control for the Belarusians arriving in Russia within the framework of the existing Belarusian-Russian agreements.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
It is a process of normalization of Belarus-EU relations. Belarus just fulfils its international commitments.
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Political analyst emphasizes that Belarus is the first modern authoritarianism in the European space, a phenomenon not yet studied by anyone.
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.