In order to show that at least some success is achieved, the Kremlin may want to absorb Belarus into the Russian Federation, the opposition politician says.
Is Russia’s influence significant in Belarus? What are two main drawbacks of the Belarusian army? What is the main threat to our independence? What can we do to protect ourselves? Mikalai Statkevich, a former presidential candidate and political prisoner, answers the questions of journalist Siarhei Peliasa in program ‘World and Us’.
“Russia is exerting an enormous influence on Belarus using, among other ways, the so called Union State. It aims at establishing a joint parliament and government, having a single president and a single currency, etc. Taking into account Russia’s land area, the Union State just set a goal to deprive Belarus of its independence,” Mikalai Statkevich said on Belsat TV.
Belarus is fully dependent on Russia as its economy is not able to survive without Russian loans and energy resources. The Belarusian culture is being destroyed, the Belarusian language has been al most destroyed, the Russian mass culture is dominant, Belarusians mainly watch Russian TV channel and therefore, they are affected by the Kremlin’s propaganda, the politician stated.
“Before the presidential elections in Russia in 2018, in order to show that at least some success is achieved, the Kremlin may want to absorb Belarus into the Russian Federation. They need to present something to the nation in the run-up of the election. Now Russia is giving less money [to Lukashenka – Belsat], but its demands are growing more and more. And now it wants our state,” Statkevich stressed.
In his opinion, the Belarusian army is well-disciplined and good enough, although it is being underfunded and lacks up-to-date aviation and air defense equipment. Another drawback is that Belarusian armed forces have never been brought in the spirit of patriotic duty to their own country; it is still a ‘unit’ of the Russian army, Statkevich added.
“Interestingly, it is our main ally that is posing the main threat to the independence of Belarus. The army is not mature enough to defend the country [from the eastern neighbour <…> Putin, even not Lukashenka, is an iconic figure for many Belarusian officers,” Mikalai Statkevich, a retired Lieutenant Colonel, said.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.