Seeking to acquire greater autonomy from Russia and not become dependent on the West, the authorities decided to develop comprehensive relations with Asian countries.
On April 13th-14th, Lukashenka made a working visit to Turkey - formally, to participate in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Summit as an observer.
There are no reasons to believe there was some anti-Russian subtext in Lukashenka’s visit to Istanbul. Meetings within the framework of intergovernmental organizations serve as a platform for communication between leaders. Participation in international summits is financially feasible, as during the visits officials may hold talks with representatives of several countries. In this regard, the OIC offers a very well represented platform - it unites 57 countries with a population of over 1.5 billion people, including Belarus’ partners: Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, the Muslim countries of the CIS. Moreover, Russia has an observer status in the OIC.
In Istanbul, Lukashenka held a number of meetings. Let us consider the most important.
During the open part of the meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the presidents discussed issues of economic cooperation. However, it is worth noting, that previously Belarus expressed interest in using Turkey’s experiences in implementing the National Missile Programme. In turn, Ankara relied on the technological support from China when creating heavy MLRS, just like Belarus.
In talks with Pakistani President Mamnoon Hussain it was announced that in less than a year, the parties had reached a strategic partnership and outlined further cooperation. Pakistan is hardly a technological or economic leader; however, the country has significant achievements in some areas, such as rocket science. Evolving with the Chinese support, the Belarusian missile programme is nearing its "maximum capacity": for political reasons Beijing is unlikely to help Minsk in creating ammunition with a range of over 300 km. That said, Pakistan might be a more open partner.
The president discussed industrial co-operation with Indonesia. Interestingly, the military-technical cooperation between Minsk and Jakarta occupies a prominent place in bilateral relations.
While speaking at the OIC Summit, Lukashenka called terrorism a ‘global threat’, fight against which was prevented by conflicts and disunity among countries. Clearly, the Belarusian regime is aiming to consolidate Belarus’ status as an international negotiation platform, the peacekeeping centre - only this time on a global scale. The Belarusian authorities believe this may ‘insure’ them against external pressure and ‘indulge’ any action (including repressions) inside the country.
“Going to Asia”, is Minsk’s strategy, rather than an opportunistic move. By developing comprehensive relations with major developing countries, Belarus seeks to acquire greater autonomy from Russia and not become dependent on the West, which the Belarusian authorities openly do not trust. In addition, the Belarusian authorities share popular in the Third World countries the principle of non-interference under any circumstances and allow arbitrary interpretations of concepts of democracy and human rights. The West, with its universal values, is regarded as an existential threat. For one, Western capitals may become situational allies and partners.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.