Within post-Soviet countries Belarus in in the top five on the Human Development Index
21.03.2013 |In the World| EuroBelarus Information Service,
According to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)'s Human Development Index annual report, Belarus is rated among countries with high level of human development.
As the UN Press Office informs, Belarus was rated by the UN 50th in the world on the Human Development Index. Among the countries at the post-Soviet area, Belarus occupies 4th place, losing to Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia.
This year “the rise of the South is radically reshaping the world of the 21st century, with developing nations driving economic growth, lifting hundreds of millions of people from poverty, and propelling billions more into a new global middle class”, says the United Nations Development Programme’s (UNDP) 2013 Human Development Report. The achievements made by the developing countries “are largely attributable to sustained investment in education, health care and social programmes, and open engagement with an increasingly interconnected world”, say the authors of the report. All in all, the human development gains in recent decades are greater than would have been predicted.
Quite predictably, Norway, Australia, the United States, the Netherlands and Germany top the list of countries with a very high human development index. The US is also reported to remain the largest economy in the world and, moreover, unlikely to be replaced by any other country in the near future.
At the bottom of the list such countries as Burkina Faso, Chad, Mozambique, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Niger can be found.
Let us recall that the UNDP reports, which are drawn up by a group of independent experts and based on various analytical data and international statistics, are published annually since 1990. The report contains data on living standards, social protection, health, education, cultural development, crime rate, environmental protection and participation of people in decision-making processes.
You can download the full text of the report here.
Within the activities of the EU-funded CHOICE, Ihor Savcha, Centre for Cultural Management, visited Albertyna Buchynska and Roman Tarnavsky, Coordinators of the activities in Boryslav (Ukraine).
Dozens of activists remain in Armenian prisons, the police carries out political orders of the ruling elite, stresses a representative of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum released on bail.
Russia has no opportunities, i.e., no intent to unleash a full-scale war against Ukraine; but the destabilization of the situation in the country remains one of its main goals.
Minsk should not deceive itself with hopes for joint operation the would-be Belarusian nuclear power plant in Astravets, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevičius said on Friday.
The confrontation of several forces in Yerevan is a no-win, and tends to worsen, the head of the Eurasia Partnership Foundation, the publicist Gevorg Ter-Gabrielyan says.
On July 17, an armed group seized the building of the Patrol-Guard Service Regiment in Erebuni district of Yerevan. First National Security Service reported about "an armed group", then – "terrorists"
About two weeks ago, on April 2, intensive clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh happened. Belarus’ reaction to it left Armenia deeply bewildered.
On April 12-13, Lithuanian border guards are holding a tactical exercise on the border with Belarus. The game is aimed at improving the staff skills to detaining illegal migrants.
By participating in all military and economic blocks with Russia, the Belarusian regime is trying to build the image of a neutral country and a peacemaker.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.