Ulad Vialichka: Responsibility for Ukraine’s fate is no longer in corporate or individual property
03.11.2014 |In the World| Piotr Kuchta, EuroBelarus,
Ukrainian society no longer wants to play the role of a statistician – responsibility for the country is divided between those who consider themselves citizens.
The Central Election Commission is now finishing to process the official voting returns from polling stations in the early elections to the Verkhovna Rada. With the vote almost completed, six parties are certain to have won seats in parliament: the Popular Front with 22.16% of the vote, the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko with 21.82%, Samopomich with 10.99%, the Opposition Bloc with 9.40%, the Radical Party with 7.44%, and Batkivshyna with 5.68%.
There are a lot of non-politicians among those who will soon get parliamentary mandates – Maidan participants, journalists, ATO partakers, members of non-governmental organizations, who have become famous within this year.
- It is obvious and clear that the role and status of civil society representatives is now much higher in comparison with the situation in the beginning of 2014, - Ulad Vialichka, the head of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, said in the interview with “EuroBelarus” Information Service. – And it is clear from the membership of the blocs that decided to take part in the elections to the Verkhovna Rada. They are now cannot be defined as political, as they are closely related to personalities many of whom became famous, popular, or trustworthy due to their active civic activity during the events of the last year in Ukraine. Besides, we see people from all different Ukrainian cities. Citizens in Ukraine are in high demand; and it is obvious for me that these elections to the Verkhovna Rada are elections among society, not among politicians.
However, Vialichka noted, it is still a question “whether civil leaders will be able to turn into politicians, how they will be able to play the role of political players in such difficult situation and in such complicated structure as the Verkhovna Rada”.
- Still, these people don’t have any particular experience in backstage political struggle. However, these people believe in their goals, have certain values, and go into the Rada because they know what they are fighting for and what they stand for. Thus, Rada is about to experience very interesting times where different attitudes towards the system of values will meet – bureaucratic and civic. But now it seems to me that civicism dominates in Ukraine in all spheres of life, including the latest elections to Rada.
Ulad Vialichka is convinced that after ten years since the Orange Revolution happened the active part of Ukrainian society has made necessary conclusions.
- I think that Ukrainians have already drawn this parallel and said themselves with certainty: “In 2004 we achieved victory but gave it up to politicians, saying them to do well”, and now there are no illusions regarding that. Today in ten years society isn’t ready to give victory to politicians; society will control them and ask them all the time whether they do what they promised to do and what they were elected for. It is the society that has changed, and the role of politicians in today’s Ukraine is fundamentally different – they are accountable to society. I think that the main change that happened in the Ukrainian society is the revolution of conscience. Ukrainians are not ready to give responsibility for the country to someone else, however strong, clean, and whatever else they are. Responsibility for Ukraine’s fate can no longer be in corporate or individual property; it is divided between those who regard themselves to be citizens.
Within the activities of the EU-funded CHOICE, Ihor Savcha, Centre for Cultural Management, visited Albertyna Buchynska and Roman Tarnavsky, Coordinators of the activities in Boryslav (Ukraine).
Dozens of activists remain in Armenian prisons, the police carries out political orders of the ruling elite, stresses a representative of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum released on bail.
Russia has no opportunities, i.e., no intent to unleash a full-scale war against Ukraine; but the destabilization of the situation in the country remains one of its main goals.
Minsk should not deceive itself with hopes for joint operation the would-be Belarusian nuclear power plant in Astravets, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevičius said on Friday.
The confrontation of several forces in Yerevan is a no-win, and tends to worsen, the head of the Eurasia Partnership Foundation, the publicist Gevorg Ter-Gabrielyan says.
On July 17, an armed group seized the building of the Patrol-Guard Service Regiment in Erebuni district of Yerevan. First National Security Service reported about "an armed group", then – "terrorists"
About two weeks ago, on April 2, intensive clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh happened. Belarus’ reaction to it left Armenia deeply bewildered.
On April 12-13, Lithuanian border guards are holding a tactical exercise on the border with Belarus. The game is aimed at improving the staff skills to detaining illegal migrants.
By participating in all military and economic blocks with Russia, the Belarusian regime is trying to build the image of a neutral country and a peacemaker.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.