Deutsche Welle published an interview with Yury Barmin, a political analyst on Russian affairs, about the shot opposition politician Boris Nemtsov’s value for Russian politics.
Boris Nemtsov was shot dead in Moscow late in the evening on February 27, a day before an opposition rally “Spring” scheduled on March, 1. DW spoke to Russia analyst Yury Barmin about Nemtsov's significance.
Why is Nemtsov's murder causing such a stir?
Nemtsov was an outspoken critic of Putin and Russia's alleged involvement in the crisis in eastern Ukraine. The murder is causing a stir because Nemtsov was one of the organizers of a protest rally that is to take place in Moscow on March 1. The opposition was quick to suggest that there is a connection between the two.
Who was Nemtsov? What made him so important after all these years?
Nemtsov had a bright political career. In the 1990s, he served as President Yeltsin's envoy in the Russian city of Nizhny Novgorod. He later served as governor of the Nizhny Novgorod region and then as the deputy prime minister of the government. So during Russia's most liberal years, he was a prominent political figure and an advocate of the withdrawal of Russia's troops from Chechnya during the First Chechen War.
Under Putin, Nemtsov was a deputy in the Russian Parliament and a member of the liberal opposition. Nemtsov had recently begun publishing reports and articles about corruption in Russia.
Was Nemtsov a threat to Putin?
I don't think he was a threat to Putin, at least he was not perceived as such. He is certainly a prominent opposition figure in Russia, but politically he was not a threat to Putin. Ilya Yashin, a liberal politician and a friend of Nemtsov's, claimed that he was going to publish a report on Russia's involvement in Ukraine and quite logically, there was a version that he was murdered to prevent him from publishing this report.
Why did Putin's spokesman call Nemtsov's murder a "provocation" and what does it have to do with the opposition rally at the weekend?
The rally, scheduled to take place on March 1, is being labeled as an anti-crisis (economic crisis) protest. There are rumors that some of the organizers want to label it as a political rally, to demand political change in the country. So there is a rivalry between these two groups within the opposition who want to see people protest for slightly different causes. Some pro-Kremlin bloggers have suggested that Nemtsov's murder is a way to change the tone of the March 1 rally. So Putin's spokesperson likely meant that the murder was a provocation against the rally. And of course, the Kremlin wants to refute any rumors about the government's connection to the murder.
Were any other opposition leaders killed in a similar manner?
Off the top of my head, Vlad Listiev, a prominent Russian journalist and head of Channel 1, was murdered 15 years ago. In fact, it happened on March 1, 1995, almost exactly 15 years ago. He was not exactly an opposition leader, but an influential person - that's for sure.
Were there any hints that Nemtsov was involved with the mafia?
I don't know of any such hints. Of course Nemtsov, like any other politician, had political rivals who could have tried to blacken his reputation by connecting him to a mafia, but I believe these would have been just rumors.
Within the activities of the EU-funded CHOICE, Ihor Savcha, Centre for Cultural Management, visited Albertyna Buchynska and Roman Tarnavsky, Coordinators of the activities in Boryslav (Ukraine).
Dozens of activists remain in Armenian prisons, the police carries out political orders of the ruling elite, stresses a representative of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum released on bail.
Russia has no opportunities, i.e., no intent to unleash a full-scale war against Ukraine; but the destabilization of the situation in the country remains one of its main goals.
Minsk should not deceive itself with hopes for joint operation the would-be Belarusian nuclear power plant in Astravets, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevičius said on Friday.
The confrontation of several forces in Yerevan is a no-win, and tends to worsen, the head of the Eurasia Partnership Foundation, the publicist Gevorg Ter-Gabrielyan says.
On July 17, an armed group seized the building of the Patrol-Guard Service Regiment in Erebuni district of Yerevan. First National Security Service reported about "an armed group", then – "terrorists"
About two weeks ago, on April 2, intensive clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh happened. Belarus’ reaction to it left Armenia deeply bewildered.
On April 12-13, Lithuanian border guards are holding a tactical exercise on the border with Belarus. The game is aimed at improving the staff skills to detaining illegal migrants.
By participating in all military and economic blocks with Russia, the Belarusian regime is trying to build the image of a neutral country and a peacemaker.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.